anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: Future Version Suggestions / Requests  (Read 264821 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Aerotower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #195 on: October 20, 2009, 05:25:37 PM »
Sir
i love ANRB, but i have no much time to join it, so i would like recorder and then review  easy my flights, but i can't remain in front of my PC 3 or 4 hours ...
Please, put in the future version a VCR style in order  to scrolling quickly
the recorded traffic and find an interesting airplane in few minutes.
Thanks in advance
Patrizio


Recorded the traffic to .rbl files.

The .rbl are to be played in RadarBox ... This does not preclude that someone can develop a program to allow viewing of these files which are simply lines of text.

In RadarBox just use a text editor program and select the rows corresponding to the time that you want to watch and place them in another text file that recorded the file extension of the recording. Even with Notepad can do this ...

Sorry my English
Regards

RodBearden

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9193
    • Rod's RadarBox Downloads
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #196 on: November 05, 2009, 04:47:13 PM »
Two requests, both of which have been mentioned before:

1 - Can we PLEASE have a Recording In Progress indicator somewhere? I often forget that I've started a recording!

2 - In MyLog, if we click on a flight, why not use the space below the photos to decode the selected the route?

Rod
Rod

Pinza

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #197 on: November 05, 2009, 11:35:33 PM »
Is it possible to have a 'callsign' field/column?

Just been watching Thomas Cook flight TCX517L descend into East Mids - which I guess was using 'Kestrel' callsign - it would be useful to have on-screen confirmation of this.

Apologies if this suggestion has been made before.

DazrahT

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #198 on: November 06, 2009, 07:42:50 AM »
Posted into correct thread this time

I have a small suggestion for the next beta.

Inclusion of Country name in route information panel.

At present, when you hover over a plane, the information panel next to the photo will only show Airport Name, ICAO code, and State name if US airport.

Could this not be expanded to include country name, which is value 'pt' in the airports database, but have this user selectable in options for those that don't want it displayed.

Although my Geography is good, I don't know where every airport is in the world!
In the middle of EGBE and EGBB

naird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
    • Beaver Tales
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #199 on: November 06, 2009, 08:32:37 PM »
Is it possible to widen the airline column to include the whole logo? Can we move the Distance/Brg box to the left say, before the Msg/Sec box? - or be able to reduce the Hardware Connected and Network box to just the coloured square. At least be able to choose format/location.

Thanks

Neil in Kingston

ascot617

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #200 on: November 08, 2009, 09:36:59 PM »
I would like to see any app that enables Milair tracking as per Plane Plotter ?

Cheers bob

dca

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #201 on: November 08, 2009, 09:43:48 PM »
Is it possible to have a 'callsign' field/column?

Just been watching Thomas Cook flight TCX517L descend into East Mids - which I guess was using 'Kestrel' callsign - it would be useful to have on-screen confirmation of this.

Apologies if this suggestion has been made before.
Pinza- this may help in the meantime...
http://www.airlinecodes.co.uk/callsign.asp
Dave
9 nm south of LGW

Fenris

  • Guest
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #202 on: November 08, 2009, 09:44:38 PM »
I would like to see any app that enables Milair tracking as per Plane Plotter ?

Not possible without accurate timestamping of the received messages.

Aerotower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #203 on: November 12, 2009, 09:58:42 PM »
Would not be possible AIRnav CREATE A MAP TO RadarBox MORE REFINED (OR IS THERE SOME AIRPORTS ARE IN WATER FOR EXAMPLE)?

eggplant

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #204 on: November 12, 2009, 10:10:11 PM »
Whilst I don't know of any airports "in the water", some are on reclaimed land i.e. Hong Kong, which appears in the water, so to speak.
Everything about Airnav is fantastic. Airnav can do no wrong. Airnav is perfect. Airnav is divine.

Aerotower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #205 on: November 12, 2009, 10:18:54 PM »
Whilst I don't know of any airports "in the water", some are on reclaimed land i.e. Hong Kong, which appears in the water, so to speak.

Hi! LPPS, LPAZ, LPGR, you want more?

RodBearden

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9193
    • Rod's RadarBox Downloads
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #206 on: November 12, 2009, 10:21:04 PM »
I was going to suggest LIMJ - yes - there are quite a few!

Rod
Rod

AirNav Support

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4127
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #207 on: November 12, 2009, 10:22:58 PM »
We have to trade off the amount of mapping points for coasts with how much CPU will need to be used.

If we model those areas accurately, it will extend CPU usage quite a bit. There are ways round this similar to what google earth uses which we will look into.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

eggplant

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #208 on: November 12, 2009, 10:30:40 PM »
Whilst I don't know of any airports "in the water", some are on reclaimed land i.e. Hong Kong, which appears in the water, so to speak.

Hi! LPPS, LPAZ, LPGR, you want more?

Clearly you are correct and I am completely wrong, but no need for sarcasm, i was only trying to help... Sigh.
Everything about Airnav is fantastic. Airnav can do no wrong. Airnav is perfect. Airnav is divine.

Aerotower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Future Version Suggestions / Requests
« Reply #209 on: November 12, 2009, 10:37:15 PM »
I apologize for the way I express
Whilst I don't know of any airports "in the water", some are on reclaimed land i.e. Hong Kong, which appears in the water, so to speak.

Hi! LPPS, LPAZ, LPGR, you want more?

Clearly you are correct and I am completely wrong, but no need for sarcasm, i was only trying to help... Sigh.
I apologize for the way I express.