Do you think there would be any mileage in a optional better quality mag mount antenna, with longer, but good quality coax, allowing more variations on whre it could be sited and does not mind spending its life outside. I,m thinking of those who are unable to erect a fully fledged antenna system.
Definitely, AirNav how about it? Better still produce a standard one with mag-maount, stainless steel whip, a good quality co-ax terminated with N-type and a 450mm N - SMA patch lead, and make sure it's DC blocked! When we're paying out £400 for an RB, you could, at least, offer us an optional upgrade, instead of the standard. I, for one, would've happily shelled out another £25 or so. My standard antenna has been outside for the last 2 - 3 months or so, and is now quite rusty and knackered - not very clever for a mag-mount (which in itself, would indicate it's for use on a car roof and out in the elements).
" The RadarBox antenna is not an internal antenna.
The antenna should ideally be positioned outdoors and clear of obstructions.
The higher the antenna, the better the performance.
Performance is enhanced by a groundmagnetic antenna to the center of the disk
The longer the feed cable, the poorer the performance.
Whilst RadarBox can work perfectly acceptably with the antenna sitting on a window ledge, you should always try to find the highest and clearest position. A skylight window is an ideal location for the antenna. If you have RadarBox installed on a laptop computer, then you will be able to move the laptop, RadarBox and antenna to find the position that gives the best performance."
Quoted from the on-line manual. I think that would actaully put AN in the unenviable position of supplying goods not fit for purpose, contrary to, and an offence under Trade Desciptions Act!