It seems we have the same problems here: please describe in detail your current antenna/amplifier setup. As RB was designed to be more sensitive than SBS-1 you are injecting too much signal into RB causing this situation.
Are you using the same antenna and conditions for both RB and SBS-1?
From our point of view both products cannot be looked the same way: it like comparing a brand new B787 against an old B737-200. RB has new technology, networked software, superior 3D graphics while SBS-1 is just a basic application that had the merit of being the first one in this area.
The market trend in just one year gave RadarBox the majority of market share (currently 75% RB to 25% SBS) which says it all.
For more details you may want to have a look at:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/download/anrb/AirNav%20RadarBox%20vs%20Competition.pdf
Dear Airnav...
We are not talking about Radarbox software because is under the eyes of everybody that R/b has a better software than SBS1. we are talking only about the sensibility/sinsivity of the hardware...
The cable/aereals configuration is not the cause of this problem because with the same cable/aereals i obtain the two different result i've told in the first post...
I think that is a problem into my hardware..
For shure i told you my cable aereal configuration:
Aereal: Wimo 10/90 (the aereal is over the roof of my home.
Cable: ECHOFLEX10 (15 mt.) connected directly to the r/b hardware
I don't use preamp or amplifier...
I know the risk caused by a storm and is accostomed for us "Ham Radio" to disconnect cables during storm...
i relink this passage of my first post:
"I've tried to test the difference also outside my home,
near Alghero airport in a place without obstacle. I've
tried SBS1 and Radarbox simultaneously on a Laptot with
their originals Aereals. The screen was divided in two.
When an airplane appear on SBS1 I could not see it on
radarbox if not 11 seconds after. The same thing happen
also after i've exchange aereals keep they in their
respective positions".
Finally:
if you told me that radarbox is less sensible than SBS1 (not too much, just a little as you can see from my first post) "due to a better software", the discussion end here, but if you tell me that the 2 products must have the same sensibility i tell you that mine is not perfect... :D
Best regards
Davis