Database Update Requests

[X]

Alan

Now we have unknown Azeri 600BBD on ground at Baku

X

[X]

 Alan

* 8967D8  DUB326                                                         2014/08/18 14:04:56 

Should be DU-326 Bell 412

8967D5 is DU-323 Bell 412, so we assume DU-324 and 325 are 8967D6 and 8967D7

X

[X]

Alan

* 4844BD                                                                 2014/08/17 22:38:29 

This is P4-LAD C130 Lynden Air Cargo re-regged from P2-LAD in last few days.

X

[X]

Alan

I have this RJ-100 also as Asian Express Airlines and might be the one referred to in the Iranian forum as the fifth that was at the time still in the UK. Been photo'd late last year in Tehran

EY-570   RJ100   3356   Asian Express Airlines (ex G-BZAX)

X

[Runway 31]

X

I saw 600BBD on the network, nothing on it.
The B412's added in.
The Lynden amended.

EY-570 hex = 51523A delivered around April 2013
EY-571 hex = 51523B delivered around May 2012

Many thanks

Alan

[X]

Alan

EY-571   51523B just departed THR but obviously cannot tell if re-regged and miscoding old hex.

However I am tad suspicious as it is on same flight number IRQ1292 as the earlier UK miscode (Iranian double coding striking again?)

X

[X]

Alan

I was right to be suspicious 41523B = 51523B!!! Yup, we have another Iranian wonky box!

X

[Runway 31]

You never know with the Iranians X, it must be a one box miscode which makes things even more difficult.  Better give them the benefit of the doubt and blame the Tajiks.

Alan

[X]

Alan

A little thought when I looked up EY-572 in db

EY-570 hex = 51523A
EY-571 hex = 51523B
and if
EY-572 hex = 51523C

What are the odds of EY-573 and EY-574 being 51523D and 51523E?

Off course if they are re-registering we know the Iranians follow a fixed hex system and can sort them out easily...except which frame is which unless with the Mk1 eyeball or hope our Iranian spotters forum will eventually give us the answer.

X

[Runway 31]

Every possibility X but I  haven't picked those 2 up yet and if they are changing to EP-*** they should change anyway.

Alan

[X]

Alan

Two are reported on the Iranian site as stored Tehran which is typical for Iranian operators. Time will tell.

Possibly those two are allocated EP-FQV and W and would explain the gap in the sequence of EP-FQT,U and last one X.

X

[Runway 31]

Cheers X

Alan

[X]

Alan

60087D is A139 4K-AZ125 Silk Way Helicopters c/n 31506, if so I would have thought 4K-AZ126 would be 60087E (if it exists) as 4K-AZ127 c/n 31510 is known to be 60087F.

600879 is therefore most likely to be A139 4K-AZ121 c/n 31495 which is our missing one if all are in a fixed hex/reg sequence

X

[X]

Alan

4K-AZ115 A139 c/n 31482 is 600873
4K-AZ118 A139 c/n 31500 is 600876

There are two more A139's according to Rotorspot with unknown reg's (31491 & 31530) but a hex/reg tie up will identify them if they plot.

X

[Runway 31]

Cheers X, I will look into the Azeris.  4K-AZ116 doesn't appear to exist or at least not as far as I can see.

My database is aware of the 2 A139's but doesn't have their registrations

Alan