anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: tunisair vc10  (Read 6136 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pcochrane12

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
tunisair vc10
« on: March 25, 2008, 06:16:23 PM »
hi all
currently have a vc10 modes s 43COB2 flying around on my flights showing it to be raf and airline as tunisair can anyone explain why
cheers paul

Marinus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2008, 06:53:34 PM »
Hi Paul,

Was it by any chance sending a flightid beginning with TAR ?
which would be the ICAO code for Tunis Air.

Regards,

Marinus.

Roadrunner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Aviation enthusiast since school visit to Heathrow
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2008, 07:03:29 PM »
I doubt that any of the RAF VC10s would be flying for Tunis air. It was ZD242 using call sign TARTN22 wh.ich is probably short for TARTAN 22.  Call signs for Military flights are sometimes shortened from longer names and it is unfortunate when the first 3 equate to a known ICAO code
« Last Edit: March 25, 2008, 07:05:44 PM by Roadrunner »

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2008, 07:19:35 PM »
I get a lot of these TARTNxx flights, they normally display with Company = Royal Air Force, and the TunisAir logo.  In fact, the RAF use so many different callsigns, you just get used to ignoring the logo for these, and look at the RAF flag and Company.

Other RAF callsigns include - FAGINxx, RRRxxxx, NATOxx, WADxxx, etc., and I'm gradually adding appropriate logos for each of these.

Roadrunner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Aviation enthusiast since school visit to Heathrow
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2008, 07:21:49 PM »
I get a lot of these TARTNxx flights, they normally display with Company = Royal Air Force, and the TunisAir logo.  In fact, the RAF use so many different callsigns, you just get used to ignoring the logo for these, and look at the RAF flag and Company.

Other RAF callsigns include - FAGINxx, RRRxxxx, NATOxx, WADxxx, etc., and I'm gradually adding appropriate logos for each of these.

You've got a full time job there then :-)

pcochrane12

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2008, 07:22:34 PM »
hi roadrunner
yep no vc10 flying for tunis air during my time on 101sqn we only lent them to us navy a couple of times and that included the aircrews
hi marinus
yes it had tarn22 as its flight id thanks for the replys
cheers paul

Roadrunner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Aviation enthusiast since school visit to Heathrow
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2008, 07:26:14 PM »
Tarbat,

Just noticed you have NATO as one you have tried to isolate for RAF. How does that fit in with NATO E3's themself using it?

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2008, 07:30:07 PM »
Just noticed you have NATO as one you have tried to isolate for RAF. How does that fit in with NATO E3's themself using it?

It doesn't fit in, so I use a NATO logo as I assume that RAF aircraft flying with a NATO callsign are probably on NATO business.

[attachment deleted by admin]

steveb25

  • Guest
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2008, 07:49:24 PM »
From my time at a lincolnshire airfield the E3's nearly always use a NATO callsign irrespective of what they are doing.

Roadrunner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Aviation enthusiast since school visit to Heathrow
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2008, 09:22:27 AM »
I have individual ones for the RAF, French and NATO in my other device that way I have immediate indication of which air force they belong to :-)

steveb25

  • Guest
Re: tunisair vc10
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2008, 09:53:06 AM »
Don't forget the good old USAF