Hi,
Just like to clarify a point. How should a Beechjet 400A and Hawker 400XP be correctly populating the AN field. Should it be "Beech Beechjet 400A" and "Hawker 400XP" respectively?
Andrew
That is very complex and I don't think we yet have a standardised format due to the uncertainty. Based on the Wikipedia entry and other data gives the following:
Mitsubishi MU-300-10 Diamond II later renamed Beechcraft Model 400 BeechjetImproved version of Diamond I; 11 built all by Mitsubishi, all subsequently redesignated as Beechjet 400s. - C/Ns were A1001SA through A1011SA, C/N renumbered to RJ-1 to RJ-11
Beechcraft Model 400 BeechjetVersion of Diamond II built after Beechcraft bought the production rights to the MU-300 from Mitsubishi, 54 built in addition to 11 Diamond IIs. C/Ns RJ-12 to RJ-65
Model 400A Upgraded model, initially produced as the
Beechcraft Beechjet 400A, then
Raytheon Beechjet 400A, then
Raytheon Hawker 400XP, then
Hawker Beechcraft Hawker 400XP.
Anyones thoughts would be appreciated, my personal preferrence would be just
Beechcraft 400 Beechjet (for RJ-),
Beechjet 400A and
Hawker 400XP (for RK-) for simplicity.
Regards ACW367