AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well  (Read 26916 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CoastGuardJon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
  • Mullion Cove, Kernow --- sw Cornwall UK.
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2009, 01:20:30 PM »
Whether it's the true price or not, it holds no interest for me, at all.
ANRB :  AOR AR8000 : Icom R-7000 : Icom IC-R9000 : JRC NRD-545 : OptoElectronics Digital Scout and OptoLinx Interface; Realistic Pro-2005 : UBC 800XLT - listed in alphabetical order, not cost, preference, performance or entertainment value!

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2009, 01:36:13 PM »
Another split 2D/3D view showing Heathrow climbouts.

Any chance of an animation showing aircraft going round in the hold ?
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

Mark07

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2009, 02:20:51 PM »
It is a plug in and available mid December and costs a one off fee of £89.95 according to a W & S advert in "Airliner" magazine out today.

Peter

No way I would be paying that much either...that's extortionate!  Will stick to planeplotter I think...

Peter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2009, 02:21:05 PM »
It features on the W & S webpage, and I've double checked the price as £89.95 together with a corresponding conversion into Euros. Advance telephone orders only being taken at present!

Peter

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2009, 02:37:33 PM »
At £89.95, it's of no interest to me either - my pension doesn't stetch that far.  I'm saving my money up for ShipTrax!!.

But I guess there'll be plenty of users willing to pay for this premium 3D upgrade.

« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 02:42:13 PM by tarbat »

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #20 on: November 11, 2009, 04:24:05 PM »
At £89.95, it's of no interest to me either - my pension doesn't stetch that far.  I'm saving my money up for ShipTrax!!.

But I guess there'll be plenty of users willing to pay for this premium 3D upgrade.

I'd certainly consider it, but I'd want to see more than just a few static images before shelling out my dosh.

The blurb implies that selecting any aircraft that I'm picking up (ADS-B only, presumably) will produce a 3D picture of the aircraft concerned - it will be interesting to see how quickly the library of airline liveries grows to keep pace with all the types and operators out there.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

MikeC

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #21 on: November 11, 2009, 04:53:03 PM »
Maybe a time limited free trial could be considered so potential customers can guage how well their PC performs and if the product justifies the price?

Pinza

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #22 on: November 11, 2009, 05:43:56 PM »
Maybe a time limited free trial could be considered so potential customers can guage how well their PC performs and if the product justifies the price?
Yes, I think that's a good idea - especially given the initial cost of buying a Radarbox.
I'd certainly be tempted but, in the current economic climate, I'd want to be 100% certain whether my existing laptop was man enough for the job before making that extra investment! Also a chance to see whether it was viable for those of us not on unlimited data ISP plans...

AirNav Support

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4120
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #23 on: November 11, 2009, 05:50:39 PM »
Some over lap with comments and ideas which we replied too in other threads.

http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=3333.0
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

abrad41

  • Guest
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #24 on: November 11, 2009, 06:35:39 PM »
AirNav

So can you confirm that the price will be £89.95

Andy


DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #25 on: November 11, 2009, 07:25:54 PM »
Some over lap with comments and ideas which we replied too in other threads.

http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=3333.0

The thread where you mention (quote) "a very small upgrade fee"  :-)
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

pjm

  • RadarBox Beta Testers
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 477
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #26 on: November 12, 2009, 12:16:30 AM »
some climbouts from YSSY (Mascot Sydney)


radarspotter10

  • Guest
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #27 on: November 12, 2009, 12:25:21 AM »
some climbouts from YSSY (Mascot Sydney)


hi pjm.
i like it, good photo.
from pat

abrad41

  • Guest
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #28 on: November 12, 2009, 08:28:05 AM »
AirNav

Quote
AirNav

So can you confirm that the price will be £89.95

Andy

Please could we have a honest and up front reply to the above.

Andy

Fenris

  • Guest
Re: RadarBox 3D testing progressing well
« Reply #29 on: November 12, 2009, 09:10:41 AM »
AirNav

Quote
AirNav

So can you confirm that the price will be £89.95


Please could we have a honest and up front reply to the above.


Well it's been on the Waters & Stanton web site unchanged for some weeks now, it seems pretty solid on that basis.