Live Network Poll

[AirNav Support]

We would be interested to hear your opinion about making the network live. We don't want a discusion about laws etc.. but just whether you would be intrested in it and any issues you think may arrise.

[abrad41]

I have gone for the real-time access, depending on the price and other rules and regs.

Andy

[Allocator]

I've voted for live data at an additional cost - providing that cost is reasonable.

[RodBearden]

To be honest, I've never been worried about the delay, but maybe I could be persuaded by trying it out.

Perhaps a free trial period for everybody may encourage people to sign up.

PS The thought just crossed my mind - does this have any implications for the 5-minute delay in recording?

Rod

[prbflight]

I'm also interested in live data but it would have to be at a very reasonable price otherwise I would be just as happy to stay with the network as it is.  Not a lot of interfering traffic where I live!

Paul@cyyb

[pjm]

I voted no, because I rarely use the network feature. Its a nice "toy" to play with occasionally, but not something I'd pay for.

More and more internet sites seem to be displaying real time data for free.

I would like to have real time data coming from the RB program for my own local use though.

[AirNav Support]

The ports and recording will still be delayed. This is to ensure we don't end up with a scenario where everyone puts it on the Internet and nobody else sees the need to buy a RB.

[tarbat]

I would really like real-time network on the odd occasion, but not sure I would pay for it every month/year.

[tarbat]

FYI, a couple of videos showing the transition from hardware to network during beta testing of the real-time network:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiiLcJhjaOA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEJOHvQ4Bbw