anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: answered, new question...  (Read 6458 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jordan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
answered, new question...
« on: July 08, 2009, 10:08:04 AM »
I was wondering if someone from the London area could check a registration for me?
Im looking for the reg of BAW 307 on the 22nd of June, I was on that flight, but the great French authorities didnt let me take any photos so i dont know what i was flying on..it was an A321, i think G-EUPX but not sure at all...
thx in advance :)
« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 06:38:50 PM by Jordan »

imropes

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
Re: Is there a problem with covering the hardware?
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2009, 10:17:36 AM »
I have mine sealed in an old video cassette plastic case- perfect fit. 2 holes for leads and sealed. have checked for heat build up -none. cant see you having a problem.

Jordan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Is there a problem with covering the hardware?
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2009, 11:51:15 AM »
Great thx, it didnt sound logic but wouldnt hurt to ask..

EMA

  • Guest
Re: Is there a problem with covering the hardware?
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2009, 12:56:41 PM »
Do not forget that nylon causes static build up and you don't want to cause an issue with the receiver front end.

Jordan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Is there a problem with covering the hardware?
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2009, 01:08:23 PM »
static on the actual decoder or the antenna?

Spaice

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Re: Is there a problem with covering the hardware?
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2009, 01:20:41 PM »
Back to the shed guys and build yourself a Faraday Cage to fit the RB box, that should keep the static at bay ;)

EMA

  • Guest
Re: Is there a problem with covering the hardware?
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2009, 01:30:11 PM »
static on the actual decoder or the antenna?

Since the antenna socket is on the back of the decoder that would be too close for comfort in my opinion.

Just a warning.

Jordan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2009, 06:39:40 PM »
Thx for the answer, I will leave it "outside" for a while..

new question main message :)

Jordan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2009, 01:36:40 PM »
another post before it goes under..

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2009, 08:42:58 PM »
another post before it goes under..

Jordan,

You seem to have changed the post at the top of this thread.  you were asking about making a nylon case for your RadarBox, but now the question is about checking a flight ID for a particular flight - the thread no longer makes sense :-(

radarspotter10

  • Guest
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2009, 08:55:28 PM »
another post before it goes under..

Jordan,

You seem to have changed the post at the top of this thread.  you were asking about making a nylon case for your RadarBox, but now the question is about checking a flight ID for a particular flight - the thread no longer makes sense :-(
hi Allocator
he most be Irish like myself, i was trying to work out what he is up to as well.
all the best pat

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2009, 08:59:29 PM »
I'm sure that he means well, just a mistake I think.

EMA

  • Guest
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #12 on: July 10, 2009, 06:40:33 AM »
May be mods can alter the title back?

Jordan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #13 on: July 10, 2009, 01:36:18 PM »
Yep I did change the main post, and I wrote it here..
I just have lots of questions and dont wanna open a thread every time..

RodBearden

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9186
    • Rod's RadarBox Downloads
Re: answered, new question...
« Reply #14 on: July 10, 2009, 01:43:22 PM »
Jordan - you are welcome to carry on with further questions in this thread, but, as Allocator said, changing thread names and altering old questions makes the answers seem like jibberish and confuses us all!

Rod
Rod