AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: V 3.0 problems  (Read 10994 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gzerovti

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
V 3.0 problems
« on: June 19, 2009, 01:20:47 PM »
I have just downloaded and installed v 3.0 but my location has moved?

I am just north of Wakefield and the map now shows me near Sheffield Airport? I have checked the lat and long and it is still as it was before. How can I adjust this?
Also, how do I get rid of the trail lines? I have unchecked the box in preferences and in maps but no good.

Hope you can help please.

Regards

Terry
G0VTI - On the flight path to EGNM

gzerovti

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2009, 01:23:26 PM »
Think I have cured both by a re-boot.

Thanks

Terry
G0VTI - On the flight path to EGNM

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2009, 01:25:16 PM »
Check that you have "Draw Home Location Legend" ticked ON in preferences.

Sorry, can't help with Trail Lines.  Unticking them in the menu (MAP - TRAIL LINES) works okay for me.

John Racars

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2009, 01:27:13 PM »
Hi All,

Wrong flightid / route information?

Exemple:

KLM Flight 1001 from EGLL to EHAM was landed at EHAM. One hour later the same aircraft departes as KLM flight 1147 to ENGM.

The departing KLM1147 shows as flightid KLM1001 with route-information EGLL-EHAM....????

What happens here? Will this (wrong) information also been written to the "MyLog" database?
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

gzerovti

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2009, 02:38:27 PM »
Thanks Tarbat, seems OK now.

Regards

Terry
G0VTI - On the flight path to EGNM

John Racars

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2009, 03:47:07 PM »
The departing KLM1147 shows as flightid KLM1001 with route-information EGLL-EHAM....????

Correction from my side on this:

Shows fligtid KLM1147 with KLM1001 information. (EGLL-EHAM but should be EHAM-ENGM).

THIS IS STILL AN EXAMPLE: I SAW THIS MORE THIS DAY IN OTHER SITUATIONS!

Sorry for any confusion but that something is going wrong in this stays clear I think.

It is also possible that I do something wrong; until sofar I read nothing about problems with this on the forum. When it is going wrong ideed, this is an important subject in the use of RB I think. Maybe I should asking direct to Support?
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

John Racars

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2009, 04:31:08 PM »
Another thing:

sudenly I have two a/c from the same place:

First:

PH-BTH routing LFPG-EHAM;
PH-BTI routing HLLT-EHAM.

And then, from the one moment to the other:

Both, BTH and BTI gives routing HLLT-EHAM.

All this is NO critism. I only want to help with given this exemples!

There was also this afternoon a verry laughing one: a KLM 737 (PH-BTG) enroute with KLM861 (EHAM-RJAA)............
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

John Racars

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2009, 04:40:15 PM »
Hi All,

One more and I will stop this exemples:

PH-SRU (a Piper-PA owned by Vliegclub Rotterdam) is operating for KLM flight 0964 EGNT-EHAM this day.....

As you can see no reaction from anyone until sofar on my postings about this. But seriously: I am not joking.....
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

EGNXR

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 259
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2009, 05:05:09 PM »
Hi John,

If we don't flag up the problems they won't be sorted out. With anything new there are always a few rough edges that need smoothing.

In these times of recession I'm sure the Airnav lads & lasses will be glad of the overtime:-)

Keep up the good work Airnav:-)

Cheers John
Based in Derby 5Nm NW of EGNX

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2009, 05:09:51 PM »
PH-SRU (a Piper-PA owned by Vliegclub Rotterdam) is operating for KLM flight 0964 EGNT-EHAM this day.....

Strange, I had KLM964 on the network earlier this afternoon, operated by F70 PH-JCT, and with the route showing as EHAM-EGNT (which is wrong, it should indeed be EGNT-EHAM).
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

John Racars

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2009, 06:02:46 PM »
Keep up the good work Airnav:-)

Hi All,

no doubt on my my part! I believe in the good work of ANRB in this case. I only report, in my case total mess in case of route information, it was good Support to inform about my findings....
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

malc41

  • RadarBox Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 586
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #11 on: June 19, 2009, 09:10:13 PM »
PH-SRU (a Piper-PA owned by Vliegclub Rotterdam) is operating for KLM flight 0964 EGNT-EHAM this day.....

Strange, I had KLM964 on the network earlier this afternoon, operated by F70 PH-JCT, and with the route showing as EHAM-EGNT (which is wrong, it should indeed be EGNT-EHAM).

Dave also saw KLM964 (PH-JCT) overhead but he was going west not east.
15 Miles East of EGNJ

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2009, 11:17:52 PM »
Dave also saw KLM964 (PH-JCT) overhead but he was going west not east.

Can you clarify - by "saw" do you mean eyeballed or saw on the screen ?

And likewise did the flight number come from RadarBox or from an ATC transmission ?
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

AirNav Development

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2545
    • AirNav Systems
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #13 on: June 20, 2009, 01:25:03 AM »
In order to keep the discussion organized, please avoid creating more topics on V3 beta public release. There is already a topic (listed below).
http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2893.0

malc41

  • RadarBox Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 586
Re: V 3.0 problems
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2009, 07:15:44 AM »
Dave also saw KLM964 (PH-JCT) overhead but he was going west not east.

Can you clarify - by "saw" do you mean eyeballed or saw on the screen ?

And likewise did the flight number come from RadarBox or from an ATC transmission ?

Eyeballed it and Flt no from both RB and ATC
15 Miles East of EGNJ