anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta  (Read 312823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Really

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #45 on: June 18, 2009, 10:08:33 PM »
Hi

I have tried both the upgrade an full download.  When I try to run the programme I get this message.  

ANRB.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close.  We are sorry for the inconvenience.

Dudley

Same problem here, I get the same message, neither the update or full program works, tried it on two different machines, both XP Pro SP3.

Not a great start.


Screenshots should it be any help, get same messages on both Desktop and Laptop, both running XP Pro SP3.




Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #46 on: June 18, 2009, 10:09:19 PM »
I found a bug. When I go to full screen and then return by pressing escape the aircraft are shown but not the map.

Tom

Seems to work OK on my laptop.  I get everything back when I exit full screen.

Manuel Mendes

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 45
    • Manuel Brito Photography
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #47 on: June 18, 2009, 10:10:01 PM »
Okay. The drop-down list was the problem. Now let's focus on the VOR and the other problems. Thanks everyone.

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #48 on: June 18, 2009, 10:12:00 PM »
Okay. The drop-down list was the problem. Now let's focus on the VOR and the other problems.

Yes, the navigation data was always going to be a difficult area to beta test, without knowledge of the whole world.  Is it worth a separate thread for people to post missing VORs, NDBs, FIXs, etc...

Typhoon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #49 on: June 18, 2009, 10:15:47 PM »
I found a bug. When I go to full screen and then return by pressing escape the aircraft are shown but not the map.

Tom

Seems to work OK on my laptop.  I get everything back when I exit full screen.

Just tried the full screen view and then return by pressing escape and the map does not show, just the aircraft.
Typhoon

Antonio Teixeira

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • SpoTThis
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #50 on: June 18, 2009, 10:16:57 PM »
I found a bug. When I go to full screen and then return by pressing escape the aircraft are shown but not the map.

Tom

Seems to work OK on my laptop.  I get everything back when I exit full screen.

Just tried the full screen view and then return by pressing escape and the map does not show, just the aircraft.

Same Here.

AirNav Support

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4120
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #51 on: June 18, 2009, 10:17:39 PM »
Please do not post individual VORs which are missing. The database should have the latest AIRAC Cycle. So if there missing there may be something to do with the data being passed through into RadarBox we will check.

Also just a reminder again. This is a beta so we are to catch bugs and any suggestions. To the guys who can't run the software, we are investigating this, this wasn't seen in any of the closed beta tests.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

Fenris

  • Guest
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #52 on: June 18, 2009, 10:18:58 PM »
Don't know about those others reporting the full screen + esc problem, but v2.0 always did this for me so it's a bug that has not yet been fixed.

Typhoon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #53 on: June 18, 2009, 10:20:02 PM »
   4CA0BC  EIN6R3   LROP-EIDW       EI-CPC  A321  Aer Lingus  
   4CA0BC  EIN6R3   LROP-EIDW       EI-CPC  A321  Aer Lingus  
   4CA224                                         EI-DCH  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA224  RYR15N   EGNM-EIDW       EI-DCH  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA64B                                         EI-DYI  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA64B  RYR6638  EDAC-EGPH       EI-DYI  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA73C  RYR5951  EGHH-EGPK       EI-EBT  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA73C  RYR5951  EGHH-EGPK       EI-EBT  B738  Ryanair

Anyone looked at MyLog Reporter?
Seem to be getting duplicate entries
Typhoon

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #54 on: June 18, 2009, 10:22:46 PM »
I also have the problem of a blank blue screen when returning from full screen, with just the aircraft displayed on a blue background.  Worked okay in the final closed beta.



Quick fix is to do on the menu bar - MAP - OPEN/SAVE - OPEN MAP.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2009, 10:24:49 PM by tarbat »

JRS98

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #55 on: June 18, 2009, 10:24:15 PM »
How about new VORs on the map that aren't actually VORs! How did that happen?

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #56 on: June 18, 2009, 10:24:51 PM »
  4CA0BC  EIN6R3   LROP-EIDW       EI-CPC  A321  Aer Lingus  
   4CA0BC  EIN6R3   LROP-EIDW       EI-CPC  A321  Aer Lingus  
   4CA224                                         EI-DCH  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA224  RYR15N   EGNM-EIDW       EI-DCH  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA64B                                         EI-DYI  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA64B  RYR6638  EDAC-EGPH       EI-DYI  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA73C  RYR5951  EGHH-EGPK       EI-EBT  B738  Ryanair  
   4CA73C  RYR5951  EGHH-EGPK       EI-EBT  B738  Ryanair

Anyone looked at MyLog Reporter?
Seem to be getting duplicate entries

Just check the times on those duplicates.  I'm only getting them when they are well separated in time.  Maybe being seen as 2 separate flights?

4CA332                                 277       2009/06/18 19:30:38 
   4CA332                              277       2009/06/18 21:50:20 
   772000                             4R-ADB   2009/06/18 21:33:35 
   772000  ALK507   VCBI-VRMM-EGLL  4R-ADB  A343 2009/06/18 19:32:57 
   738074  ELY317   LLBG-EGLL       4X-ECD  B772  2009/06/18 19:28:15 
   738074  ELY318   EGLL-LLBG       4X-ECD  B772   2009/06/18 21:39:57 
   4C8021  CY333    EGLL-LCLK       5B-DBT  A332         2009/06/18 21:12:01 
   4C8021  CYP326   LCLK-EGLL       5B-DBT  A332        2009/06/18 19:10:18 
   04C02A  KQA101   EGLL-HKJK       5Y-KQY  B763      2009/06/18 19:32:15 
   044027                           9G-AXA  DC86  2009/06/18 21:09:19 
   4D201C                           9H-AEF  A320 2009/06/18 19:11:08
« Last Edit: June 18, 2009, 10:28:00 PM by Allocator »

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #57 on: June 18, 2009, 10:28:28 PM »
Ditto on duplicates in MyLog.  I only see duplicates when there's a time-gap between flights.  Looks okay to me.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2009, 10:39:49 PM by tarbat »

charlie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #58 on: June 18, 2009, 10:41:26 PM »
Just done a full install.

Runs faster, menu's faster, search engine faster.

It's just faster.

Brill

Fenris

  • Guest
Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta
« Reply #59 on: June 18, 2009, 10:44:20 PM »
Ditto on duplicates in MyLog.  I only see duplicates when there's a time-gap between flights.  Looks okay to me.

Looking at Allocator's log extract, it seems that the two aircraft that are listed twice are first on the outward and then on the return legs of their routes, so they are probably legit 'dupes'. Less sure about the first 4 entries, the second pair looks similar but one route missing, and the first pair has too little information to work out what's happening.

I suspect it is useful to know that you've seen something twice, even if the times are not *that* far apart.