AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms  (Read 4260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bratters

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 935
Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« on: October 19, 2013, 11:35:00 AM »
This is at the foot of the new  beta spec......

"Users who don't share flight data and not subscribed to the network will not received flight (photo/route information from server"

Does this mean that since I do not subscribe to the Network I will no longer get flight details, photos and route information?

CYYZGUY

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1627
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2013, 11:39:27 AM »
I also saw that and was wondering.....
2 Nm North from Canada's Busiest Airport CYYZ

DPD 1090 Mhz Antenna with LMR-400 Cable
Antenna 35 Feet (11 Meters) standing tall
Dedicated Airnav Station with 16 Gigs ram
Dedicated Radarbox24 Station with 16 Gigs ram
40" LED Monitor
40" LED Monitor
BCD996XT, BCT15X, BCT15X, BCT15 and BCD436 receiver

AirNav Support

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4120
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2013, 11:40:27 AM »
If you do not have the network subscription you will still see photo/route information if you share data.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2013, 11:41:01 AM »
You will get autolookup/photos/routes/etc. if you EITHER subscribe to the network, OR share your flight data.

bratters

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 935
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2013, 11:44:26 AM »
It would have helped if that had been made clear at the outset.

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2013, 11:45:44 AM »
Quote from: bratters
It would have helped if that had been made clear at the outset
Agreed, although a simple mistake between an "and" and an "or"!!

CoastGuardJon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
  • Mullion Cove, Kernow --- sw Cornwall UK.
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2013, 11:54:51 AM »
Makes a huge difference though!
ANRB :  AOR AR8000 : Icom R-7000 : Icom IC-R9000 : JRC NRD-545 : OptoElectronics Digital Scout and OptoLinx Interface; Realistic Pro-2005 : UBC 800XLT - listed in alphabetical order, not cost, preference, performance or entertainment value!

AirNav Development

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2545
    • AirNav Systems
Re: Clarification sought on RB 5.0 beta terms
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2013, 08:33:13 PM »
Regarding access to flight information/photos/aircraft information as retrieved from the server and how V5 deals with it:
- If user is not a network subscriber he will continue to have access to the above data if he is sharing his mode-s comms - if he is not sharing no photos/aircraft info/flight origin-destination info;

- I user is a network subscriber he will access the data with or without sharing;