anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: Idea for new feature: Is it just you who is supplying the network for an aircraf  (Read 6113 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

bailey_uk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Just had the idea, that it would be interesting to know if its only you that is receiving the ADS-B for a particular aircraft and putting it into the network?

For this, there could be an extra collumn in the interface saying if this is the case, so you would instantly know, that it is soley your equipment that is providing the network for that aircraft.

It would also suggest that if you are to switch off your RB, then that aircraft in its current position would no longer show up on anyone elses Networked flights, and so entice you to keep your RB on for others benefit?

I guess it would benefit people in far out locations, but then again at night you'd maybe find it interesting how much use you personally are to the whole scheme?

Is this something that could be done? What are your thoughts?

Regards

James
Possibly the youngest RadarBox Owner!

chris10

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Just had the idea, that it would be interesting to know if its only you that is receiving the ADS-B for a particular aircraft and putting it into the network?

For this, there could be an extra collumn in the interface saying if this is the case, so you would instantly know, that it is soley your equipment that is providing the network for that aircraft.

It would also suggest that if you are to switch off your RB, then that aircraft in its current position would no longer show up on anyone elses Networked flights, and so entice you to keep your RB on for others benefit?

I guess it would benefit people in far out locations, but then again at night you'd maybe find it interesting how much use you personally are to the whole scheme?

Is this something that could be done? What are your thoughts?

Regards

James

would disagree with you, did you ever go into a gym and watch the posers, that's the way it would end up here. i think it would put people off.

dca

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
I think its a reasonable idea!
9 nm south of LGW

jgrloit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
A variation on the idea, which may be of more use, on Military Aircraft -   A count on how many systems are receiving the aircraft.
This when compared to the Real location map of RB users online could help to give an idea of the area that a Mode-S aircraft is in..!!!
Based in Hexham - Tyne Valley 
Best view for RB is North of a line between EGNT and EGNC  - includes OTA and Spade, to EGPH above 7500ft.   Can be TRUE mobile with Mobile Broadband feed to Network.

viking9

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 823
    • Aircraft Photography
A variation on the idea, which may be of more use, on Military Aircraft -   A count on how many systems are receiving the aircraft.
This when compared to the Real location map of RB users online could help to give an idea of the area that a Mode-S aircraft is in..!!!


Just buy PlanePlotter and sign up for Mlat.
Tom
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk UK
15 miles SE of EGUN
32 miles SE of MAM > DIKAS track
http://www.viking9.co.uk

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Don't you need an SBS-1 and a degree in Physics to make PP MLAT work?  I did think about getting my SBS out, but I just can't be bothered to go through all that setting up again.

All credit to Bev though, with his continued development of PP :-)

Edit: Bev, not Bec - typing error corrected!
« Last Edit: May 05, 2009, 10:05:41 PM by Allocator »

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
You can use MLAT in PP without an SBS-1.  You can even try it out for 21 days before paying the €12 fee.  I tried it out, but didn't find it that useful.

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Ah, OK tarbat, all understood.

viking9

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 823
    • Aircraft Photography
I tried it out, but didn't find it that useful.

It's the only way to track positionless aircraft. That's why I suggested it. I've tracked 15 US Mil ac for over 100 miles each today. Most verified by ATC routing on VHF/UHF.
Tom
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk UK
15 miles SE of EGUN
32 miles SE of MAM > DIKAS track
http://www.viking9.co.uk

abrad41

  • Guest
Tom or Tarbat

You got a link for MLAT. so I can have a look

Cheers

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross

abrad41

  • Guest
Thank you tarbat