Interesting Military Aircraft

Started by Canonjohns40D, April 14, 2009, 09:31:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Canonjohns40D

Hi on the box now AE08D6 USAF Boeing OC135B 61-2672 c/s Cobra 72 Ht 34000 sqwk 7662.

John
Hi I'm John... and I'm a Radarbox User. I'm based in Bangor Co Down Northern Ireland.

puddy

French Air Force Dassault Mirage IIIC reg 50 35 c/n50

Think he was going to RAF Waddington, they have a big airshow this weekend

puddy
Radar Box & AOR8200 mk3 scanner
South Lincolnshire near Boston (UK)

aps

Got a nice little couple of interesting ones this morning ...

J-638 Netherlands AF F-16
T-264 Netherlands KC-10

plus ZJ190 Apache and the Nimrod still kicking around !

cheers Tony

DaveReid

Quote from: puddy on June 30, 2009, 12:42:19 PM
French Air Force Dassault Mirage IIIC reg 50 35 c/n50

Think he was going to RAF Waddington, they have a big airshow this weekend

Where on earth did you get that tie-up from ?  What was the hex code ?

The French Air Force retired their Mirage IIICs twenty years ago (the aircraft was a contemporary of the RAF's Lightning) and c/n 50 is in the museum at Savigny.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

EGNXR

Quote from: DaveReid on June 30, 2009, 01:41:42 PM
Quote from: puddy on June 30, 2009, 12:42:19 PM
French Air Force Dassault Mirage IIIC reg 50 35 c/n50

Think he was going to RAF Waddington, they have a big airshow this weekend

Where on earth did you get that tie-up from ?  What was the hex code ?

The French Air Force retired their Mirage IIICs twenty years ago (the aircraft was a contemporary of the RAF's Lightning) and c/n 50 is in the museum at Savigny.


It wasn't 3F9923 50+35  C160 that was around yesterday was it as airliners.net don't like the + in the serial. Hence the 50 35. Just a thought.

John
Based in Derby 5Nm NW of EGNX

DaveReid

Quote from: EGNXR on June 30, 2009, 04:24:19 PM
It wasn't 3F9923 50+35  C160 that was around yesterday was it as airliners.net don't like the + in the serial. Hence the 50 35. Just a thought.

The Transall sounds a lot more believable.

However 3F9923 does indeed come up in RadarBox with details for French Air Force Mirage IIIC "50 35", complete with a link to a photo of Russian Air Force Mi-8MTV "50 blue" !!

Come on AirNav, it's not rocket science, you know what you need to do to get the aircraft details and photos working properly ...
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

EGNXR

In fairness,

3F9923 almost downloaded correctly without the +
I got one photo of the transall and one of a japanese P-3J. I look forward to V3.0 being sorted then Airnav can get on with sorting all the database issues.

John
Based in Derby 5Nm NW of EGNX

DaveReid

Quote from: EGNXR on June 30, 2009, 05:41:56 PMI got one photo of the transall and one of a japanese P-3J

Now I'm even more confused - are you saying that users don't all get the same photos when they pick up the same aircraft ?
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

Allocator

The problem is if the aircraft 'registration' is something daft like 234.  A search on airliners.net with such a meaningless registration is always going to fail, whether it is done manually or automatically by RB autopopulate.

Just try this one example to see the effect!

jgrloit

One onthe box today  :-

B1871A  FlightID STORM51   Squawk 7000 Height 14700  - Not found on Airframes, even as a False!!!!
Any ideas please.
Based in Hexham - Tyne Valley 
Best view for RB is North of a line between EGNT and EGNC  - includes OTA and Spade, to EGPH above 7500ft.   Can be TRUE mobile with Mobile Broadband feed to Network.

DaveReid

Quote from: Allocator on June 30, 2009, 06:16:18 PMThe problem is if the aircraft 'registration' is something daft like 234.  A search on airliners.net with such a meaningless registration is always going to fail, whether it is done manually or automatically by RB autopopulate.

That's precisely my point - the RadarBox server ignores the fact that it already has a hex code by the time it does the photo lookup and hence knows the type, and probably the operator, as well as the 'reg'.

So instead of searching airliners.net for a photo of the aircraft it has already identified, say 'French Air Force Mirage F1 234' for example, instead the AirNav server does a totally random search based solely on the serial, and not only does it display a photo of the first '234' that it comes across, whether or not it bears any relation to the already-identified aircraft, it even populates the database with details which could be for a completely unrelated aircraft.

As I said in a previous post, AirNav have said that once V3.0 has settled down they will be looking at better ways of doing the above.  I hope we don't have too long to wait.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

AirNav Development

We copied this one. We will investigate what might be wrong with the server algorithm.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

Bethsalem


atcukmatty

Hi john, did you see the 'emergency taking off from aldergrove had to turn back?

Canonjohns40D

Hi Matty no I was bowling so missed it. Did you see or log the  USAF Boeing 737 C40-BBJ AE11FA he has been in aldergrove today.

John
Hi I'm John... and I'm a Radarbox User. I'm based in Bangor Co Down Northern Ireland.