AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: A Bit Cramped !  (Read 4139 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dl1812

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
A Bit Cramped !
« on: March 07, 2009, 12:04:12 PM »
My RB is currently showing AAL113 as departing Heathrow for KMIA, and as being operated by "N7942B" - a C172 !!!

Fair old hop for one of them with 200 passengers on board.
Wonder how they'll fit in - pictues of the passengers on the wings of the A320 on the Hudson River come to mind....

It's good to smile !
Logged

EK01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
Re: A Bit Cramped !
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2009, 03:45:23 PM »
See my thread from January 31st regarding this particular flight !

Cheers,

Ian
Logged

jgrloit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
Re: A Bit Cramped !
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2009, 05:05:51 PM »
Logged
Based in Hexham - Tyne Valley 
Best view for RB is North of a line between EGNT and EGNC  - includes OTA and Spade, to EGPH above 7500ft.   Can be TRUE mobile with Mobile Broadband feed to Network.

Hamish McTorsk

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • Radarspotters
Re: A Bit Cramped !
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2009, 03:00:05 PM »
Funny thing, I just had exactly the same thing, different aircraft though.
Box reported a c172 (OK-TEC) at 37000ft with a gs of 445 from LKPR-ENGM.
Logged

EK01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
Re: A Bit Cramped !
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2009, 03:22:40 PM »
As before, check the mode S code with airframes or GAS. Another case of short-sighted pilots putting in incorrect details.

Cheers,

Ian
Logged

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: A Bit Cramped !
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2009, 03:47:29 PM »
Quote from: EK01 on March 08, 2009, 03:22:40 PM
Another case of short-sighted pilots putting in incorrect details.

No - it's simply a tie-up that's incorrect, nothing to do with what the crew has or hasn't done.
Logged
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour
Pages: [1]
« previous next »