For the earlier posts the network routes are not saved down as otherwise each if you would be saving down 1,000s of routes each time you connected to the network which is not a good idea.
I'm not asking about the capability of 'downloading' the routes for network traffic. As you say this would involve 1000's of requests coming in from users which would not be a good idea!
What I'm referring to is a change to the RB local software that would use the information that has already been populated (and downloaded) for network traffic and add this to the local routes table.
Presently if you click on an aircraft in the network list the software will request an update from the server if you don't have it in your aircraft table or you don't have a photo of it. What I'd like to request is an addition whereby if you click on an aircraft in the network flights list and the flight route is already populated for it that information is checked in the
local routes table and if necessary added to that table - no server request involved, purely a local process. There would be local processor overhead involved but it could be a user selectable option.
Maybe I'm getting confused with regard to route information that displays for network flights. Is it actually the case that all of the routes I can see are already actually in my local routes table? I was under the impression that this information was added at AirNav's end (therefore only one request per flight) or included in the upload from the user and then included in the feed that we see.
Testmonkey,
Take a look at the Routes table in RB Database Explorer.......... just copy the NavData.db3 from my mian PC to the laptop every now and then.
Hi Allocator
My message probably wasn't very clear! I only use the laptop so no need to transfer the db's around. I just wanted to capture routes that don't normally overfly me so I would have that info when on the road (or abroad) in the locality where they do fly.
Cheers