You can explain the antenna theory, because the dimensions other than the sides of V and radials, do not correspond to a multiple of the wavelength.
Thank you.
For
Wire Collinear antennas, your requirement that
all wire sections should
necessarily be an exact multiple of wavelength, is not valid.
Please open and check dimensions of some successful commercial wire-collinear 1090 MHz antennas, or easier, please search the web for DIY wire collinear antennas, and you will find a lot of these do not meet your requirement of "all wire sections necessarily be multiple of wavelength". Some, but not all, wire sections may meet your requirement.
I have run a computer simulation of this design to verify & optimized it's dimensions, and posted results in the very first post. These results show it to be a good design (
good gain, swr, and radiation paftern).
As the computer simulation software uses the laws & formulas of electromagnetic waves and their radiation, once the simulation software tells the dimensions give good gain, swr, and radiation patter, it means the design conforms to electromagnetic wave theories.
In addition to confirmation by computerized simulation software, I have checked it's performance by making it and doing a trial run, side by side with Flightaware 1090Mhz antenna, and compared results. The comparison proved that the V-Stub design performs good.
.