The routing of DLH8MA should be EDDV-EDDF
2011-12-11 00:31:43 EDDV 27C BER3718 B738 D-ABBJ 2580 3C484A hasn't landed on RW27C, because it's way to big for this RW, but did land on RW27R.
By the way, I don't know any airframe in my area that is equipped with ADS-B and is able to land on RW27C. As mentioned before 750m long and maximum take off weight 7500kg. The actual routines are working better then the first ones, but still generating false RW 27C entries, where it should be RW 27R. Just thinking: If the integration former mentioned plausibility check is to complex/difficult, why not entirely wiping RW27C from the routines? Yes, this will generate false entries for airframes, that are really using RW27C, but this may result in an error rate of one or two per week or even per month instead of 5 to 6 by day.
