RadarBox Software Update

Started by AirNav Development, October 26, 2011, 11:42:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

tarbat

Quote from: Henning on December 04, 2011, 11:06:26 PMIt's that the altitude of the aircraft in the 3D-view is not correct:

I missed that one.  Now added to the list as #22.

neroon79

#1 on the bug-list for the bug-list. ;-):

Unfortunately, there is no #22 in the pdf Document...

Ingo
Greetings from northern Germany, Ingo
11.75nm ESE of EDDV

SW: ANRB v5.00.072/6.01.001 on WIN10 64Bit Pro&Home
HW:
Ant.: DPD Productions ADS-B Vertical Outdoor Base Antenna
AMP: Kuhne electr. KU LNA 1090 A TM
Cable: 25m of ECOFLEX 15+
NB: Asus P53E 24/7 op.
PC: 28"4K + 24" Monitor
AirSpy mini @RPi3

tarbat

Quote from: neroon79 on December 05, 2011, 05:57:44 PMUnfortunately, there is no #22 in the pdf Document...

Yes there is.  Page 2, 4th from the bottom.

Henning

Thanx, Tarbat.

I hope that "LOW" and "VERY FEW" doesn't mean that it won't ever be fixed... As I mentioned before it's just a very small fix which should be implemented within one minute.

daelight

Just to chime in on the area of the Application Interface - if all that empty space around the Menus and Toolbars could be recovered (allow user to remove toolbar or adjust it) and the status bar at the bottom ,, thanks.

snowman

From an aesthetic (and ATC) point of view I would like the +/- for climbing/descending replaced with up/down arrows. Surely this can't be a big thing to do !

knight01

How about putting the "green splash loading screen" in the background when the software is being loaded.  It's very annoying when radarbox software takes 3-4 minutes to load and having that splash screen in front and blocking all windows.
This only happens with the radarbox software and never happens with other software I use with Win 7 .  It's like going back to Windows 3.1 days when this was the norm, never thought it would still be happening in Windows 7.

CZUL

I do not normally send in requests for changes to the software but I have a few things. If they have been addressed or already requested, please accept my apologies.

1. Can the recording function have an option to close the recording file every 24hrs and then start a new one?

2. Can the Island of Montreal (CYUL) be added to the map? I really do not live underwater.

3. Has there been any progress ion allowing the color config to remain after the app is restarted?

4. Diagnostic tools to measure over all performance of the signal strength and hardware? So if your antenna or coax become problematic you can see what's going on.

Again, if these have been asked I am sorry.

Regards
Paul

CZUL

Quote from: snowman on December 06, 2011, 02:52:06 PM
From an aesthetic (and ATC) point of view I would like the +/- for climbing/descending replaced with up/down arrows. Surely this can't be a big thing to do !

I agree, that would be really nice to have.

RodBearden

#54
Hi Paul

Re point no 3 - your colours will be remembered if, once you've changed them how you want, you export them as Default and also as Real Radar. This is certainly something that should be improved, but at least it's a good work-round.

Rod
Rod

CZUL


snowman

Another change I would like is the ability to configure the contents of the aircraft label. For example whether you have the hdg or spd or altitude showing, or any combination of the three, whether you can show just the callsign or just the registration or the type , just the destination instead of departure and destination and also how many lines you want to see on the label with the option of one, two or three.