anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: Map anomaly  (Read 6706 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

viking9

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 823
    • Aircraft Photography
Map anomaly
« on: January 23, 2009, 08:31:55 AM »
Yesterday I was tracking a Gulfstream five via the network. It tracked over Scotland onto the polar track. Then the map changed to the South pole. Anyone any idea if it's an ac GPS anomaly or a problem with ANRB software?

I tried to post a screenshot but I get an error even though the file is only 48.1kb.

Tom
Tom
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk UK
15 miles SE of EGUN
32 miles SE of MAM > DIKAS track
http://www.viking9.co.uk

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2009, 08:46:54 AM »
Tom,

Do you mean that the position of the aircraft jumped?

viking9

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 823
    • Aircraft Photography
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2009, 08:55:34 AM »
Hi Allocator,

Yes, I wasn't watching it all the time, but one minute it was over Greenland, next time I looked it was over Antartica.

Tom
Tom
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk UK
15 miles SE of EGUN
32 miles SE of MAM > DIKAS track
http://www.viking9.co.uk

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2009, 09:09:14 AM »
Aircraft position anomoly.  Similar question a couple of posts earlier that I answered last night - http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2035.msg16676#new

Or try a search on "purple rain".

Allocator

  • RadarBox24.com Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2009, 09:14:04 AM »
Tom,

See this thread regarding "Purple Rain":

http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=671.0

Because you were tracing the aircraft, you would see the map jump rather than the purple lines as the aircraft transmitted a duff position.

Not a RB problem, but an aircraft issue - some suggest done deliberately to partially conceal the position.

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2009, 09:20:43 AM »
Definately some aircraft that appear to deliberately conceal their position:
G-BUUR with position N12 00.0 E000 00.0
G-BTPF with positions N12 00.0 E000 00.0 and S42 00.0 E000 00.0

viking9

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 823
    • Aircraft Photography
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2009, 09:23:54 AM »
You could well be right as it is a known MIB ac.

Tom
Tom
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk UK
15 miles SE of EGUN
32 miles SE of MAM > DIKAS track
http://www.viking9.co.uk

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2009, 01:13:51 PM »
Definately some aircraft that appear to deliberately conceal their position:
G-BUUR with position N12 00.0 E000 00.0
G-BTPF with positions N12 00.0 E000 00.0 and S42 00.0 E000 00.0

I find that hard to believe. 

I've logged G-BUUR and G-BTPF many times since, respectively, Oct 2006 and Nov 2007, and both as recently as this week.  Neither has ADS-B so I have no idea where those spurious coordinates originated from but they certainly didn't come from the aircraft !
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

Fenris

  • Guest
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2009, 03:14:15 PM »
Definately some aircraft that appear to deliberately conceal their position:
G-BUUR with position N12 00.0 E000 00.0
G-BTPF with positions N12 00.0 E000 00.0 and S42 00.0 E000 00.0

I find that hard to believe. 

I've logged G-BUUR and G-BTPF many times since, respectively, Oct 2006 and Nov 2007, and both as recently as this week.  Neither has ADS-B so I have no idea where those spurious coordinates originated from but they certainly didn't come from the aircraft !

I don't believe there is much, if any, error correction in the MOde S transmissions.

It could be simply that a corrupted message is received that happens to appear to contain this information.

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2009, 05:26:33 PM »
I don't believe there is much, if any, error correction in the MOde S transmissions.

It could be simply that a corrupted message is received that happens to appear to contain this information.

The Mode S spec includes a 24-bit parity string in the ACAS and ADS-B squitters, which ought to be usable by Mode S receivers, although I have no idea whether RadarBox or SBS actually make use of this.

The surveillance interrogation responses, OTOH, overlay the parity on top of the aircraft address, which means that even one mangled bit in a 56- or 112-byte packet can produce invalid data with no way that we can detect this.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

viking9

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 823
    • Aircraft Photography
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2009, 06:27:23 PM »
Wouldn't just a minus in an otherwise correct latitude be enough to switch poles?
Tom
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk UK
15 miles SE of EGUN
32 miles SE of MAM > DIKAS track
http://www.viking9.co.uk

Terry

  • Guest
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2009, 07:37:13 PM »
Here`s another strange A/C position  SPAR 76
                                                      010076
                                                      FL-68
                                                      GLF
Current position  "Middle of Antartica"?

   Regards Terry.

Fenris

  • Guest
Re: Map anomaly
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2009, 12:43:47 PM »
I don't believe there is much, if any, error correction in the MOde S transmissions.

It could be simply that a corrupted message is received that happens to appear to contain this information.

The Mode S spec includes a 24-bit parity string in the ACAS and ADS-B squitters, which ought to be usable by Mode S receivers, although I have no idea whether RadarBox or SBS actually make use of this.

The surveillance interrogation responses, OTOH, overlay the parity on top of the aircraft address, which means that even one mangled bit in a 56- or 112-byte packet can produce invalid data with no way that we can detect this.

I have not looked into this much Dave, but what is the parity data protecting? Is it calculated over the whole data field, or is it partial?