Something puzzling me about all this.
Airnav supply us (RB owners) with Network data - free for a year. After one year, we can continue to use the Network but on a subscription basis, price dependent on whether delayed or live. On the other hand, we could view live, if limited, European data from Radiovirtuel for absolutely nothing. However, some of this data has originated from those same RB owners that Airnav want to charge for seeing it.
Hope that makes sense but this situation strikes me as bizarre.
While I don't like paying over the odds for anything, I wouldn't want to see the Airnav operation and product suffer by being un-necessarily cash-starved. If, as Airnav claims, it costs a lot to run the live Network and those costs have to be met, then surely enabling a data supply for the likes of Radiovirtuel to offer a closely competitive product buckshee is akin to shooting yourself in the foot?
Maybe I've got it round my neck?
