AirNav Systems Forum

AirNav RadarBox and RadarBox24.com => AirNav RadarBox and RadarBox24.com Discussion => Topic started by: Kenny on October 19, 2013, 07:05:58 AM

Title: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Kenny on October 19, 2013, 07:05:58 AM
Finally we have RB 5.00

For those who bite the bullet upgrade to RadarBox 5.00.044 and would like to share your experience and bug found.  Please post here.

Mine download and upgrade is fine. 
Here are my findings in the first 15 min:
- The airport name now shows correctly.
- Report shows all contact are new contact
- Recipient email to sent log to are lost

Hope it will be stable enough since I will be away from this RB for the whole week.

Kenny
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 09:15:28 AM
Quote from: Kenny
- Report shows all contact are new contact
Checked, and reproduced.  Logged on bug tracker (FS#237).
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 10:04:57 AM
I just did the upgrade and my Radar Rings no longer extend over the water.

And I thought someone mentioned that flights like Westjet who populate the flight ID's with just a number would now be recognized and logos displayed?

Cheers,

Jason
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 10:08:29 AM
Quote from: CYYZGUY
I just did the upgrade and my Radar Rings no longer extend over the water.

A screenshot might help to understand the problem.  Maybe check your colour settings?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 10:11:25 AM
Here is the screenshot

(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7459/10359128455_aa632d260e_o.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/10359128455/)
NoRingsoverwater (http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/10359128455/) by CYYZGUY (http://www.flickr.com/people/[email protected]/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 10:13:18 AM
The problem of airlines not displaying the ICAO code part of their flight ID will be addressed in a later update

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 10:17:09 AM
Just checked my map and the radar rings are displayed which would suggest the colour scheme you use could do wiht some adjustment.  See attached shot
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 10:20:02 AM
I just changed my radar rings to a bright white, which should easily go over the blue water with no effect.

I will try to close down and restart the software,


Cheers
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 10:25:09 AM
CYYZGUY, I've managed to reproduce the problem.  It seems specific to your location, so I'll log this as a bug.  Seems to only affect interior water such as lakes, etc.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 10:30:33 AM
Thank you sir, I will just run it without the Radar Rings from now on, otherwise it will drive me crazy...

:))
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 10:31:20 AM
weird huh!!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 10:32:41 AM
Yeh, very weird.  But hey, that's what public beta testing is for!!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 10:50:40 AM
On a plus note, I notice a MUCH faster shutdown and startup of the software.  Also, screen movement seems a little more fluid to me.  Overall, so good so far other then the Radar Rings not showing over lakes around Ontario Canada..

Are we ever going to be able to adjust the column widths "flightid's, registration, aircraft etc...."??
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 11:25:48 AM
Ok, does anyone have a solution for this?  Under "Home Station Data" It is coming up as "Toronto" which is close to me.

Before it was Blank.   I was using my manually inputted co-ordinates to centre on my house.

How can I remove "Toronto" from the Home Station Data drop down menu?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 11:30:27 AM
Right click on the map at your home location, and select "Set as home location".
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 11:32:41 AM
As always, thank you!!!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 11:36:39 AM
Quote from: CYYZGUY
On a plus note, I notice a MUCH faster shutdown and startup of the software.  Also, screen movement seems a little more fluid to me.
That's good.  a fair bit of development went into "under-the-hood" improvements.

Quote from: CYYZGUY
Are we ever going to be able to adjust the column widths "flightid's, registration, aircraft etc...."??
Not in RB5 - at some point we had to stop and release the beta.  Maybe something for the next version, including being able to change the sequence of columns as well.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 11:42:42 AM
As an update , the "Geographical Co-Ordinates" do not show over any masses of water as well.
And where it says "Map Centre" at the top of your screen also gets cut off over water..for my location anyways..

cheers,
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 11:47:21 AM
Quote from: CYYZGUY
As an update , the "Geographical Co-Ordinates" do not show over any masses of water as well.
And where it says "Map Centre" at the top of your screen also gets cut off over water..for my location anyways..
Noted - thanks for the feedback.  As beta testers it's really annoying when we miss a bug :(
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 19, 2013, 11:52:00 AM
HIi Chris,
It's good to see that you're back on board and involved with the Beta testing and development, with you, Alan and the others pushing forward we may get the product that we all want.
CGJon
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 11:52:47 AM
Jason, regarding the rings, does it do the same with the satallite layer and or the OpenStreet Map layer?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 11:54:13 AM
Hi Tarbat, now with the "Start Update" for the database update feature, does this mean when I post for example a "no route being showing" request under the database updates thread and it gets updated by Alan or whoever, it will automatically be downloaded?

Should we be doing the "Start Update" feature daily to keep up with additions as they come along?

Hopefully you understand what I mean....
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 19, 2013, 11:56:17 AM
what is RB1 and RB2 when the software is started?

Because it says RB1 found and RB2 not found.

Thanks
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 19, 2013, 11:57:00 AM
Hi Alan, yes it does, just tested it.  No rings/co-ordinates show...
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Roadrunner on October 19, 2013, 11:58:15 AM
Uploaded the upgrade (first use of RB for over a year) and all appears well using the 4.3 upwards version.
Just one thing I dont seem able to adopt 2d version etc has that been dissabled with 5.00?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 19, 2013, 12:00:11 PM
Hi all, copied over from the Development Update topic Reply #239 as it should be in here really?

"Oh, this is really great, downloaded and installed the "upgrade" version - and whilst RB seems to load and open, I've no display screen - I just get error messages, such as "Could not obtain OLE control window handle".  RB is working OK, just haven't got my display screen!   Wonderful..........."

As everyone else seems to be OK, I've probably done something wrong!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 12:01:46 PM
Hi Roadrunner,

2D is what I am using and going by the previous post i think most are using it as well.  Could you close down and restart and see if the problem persists with you.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 12:02:03 PM
Quote from: Aerotower
what is RB1 and RB2 when the software is started?
RB1 is the Radarbox hardware.

Quote from: Roadrunner
Just one thing I dont seem able to adopt 2d version etc has that been dissabled with 5.00?
2D mode should work okay.  What happens when you click on the "Map View" button?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 12:03:25 PM
John,

If you have not already done so, could you close down and restart and advise if the problem persists.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 19, 2013, 12:13:52 PM
Thanks Tarbat!

Can you send me or put in the forum this files - GE_Models and GE_Layers folders and maybe some other files for 3D.

Regards

P.S- Why all the planes are to appear in the Report as new, if I just did an upgrade?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 12:30:52 PM
Aerotower, did you loose your 3D models and layers in the upgrade process?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Roadrunner on October 19, 2013, 12:35:30 PM
I have closed and restarted ANRB the first thing I notice is that on loading it shows RB1 Found RB2 not found whatever that means. I am in 3D but as soon as I close 3D the screen goes grey and although the list of sircraft still shows I see no map whatsoever....
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 19, 2013, 12:39:20 PM
No Alan i have upgrade from 3.03 2D, but now i want to put on this one the 3D models.


CORRECTION: Not 3.03 but 3.13.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 01:03:05 PM
Quote from: Aerotower
No Alan i have upgrade from 3.03 2D, but now i want to put on this one the 3D models.

My guess is you have two choices.  Either install 4.03 and then upgrade to 5.00.044, or probably best to uninstall, and do a full install of v5.

And you can safely ignore the RB2 not found message.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 01:09:23 PM
Quote from: CYYZGUY
Hi Tarbat, now with the "Start Update" for the database update feature, does this mean when I post for example a "no route being showing" request under the database updates thread and it gets updated by Alan or whoever, it will automatically be downloaded?

Should we be doing the "Start Update" feature daily to keep up with additions as they come along?

I don't know how frequently the database updater should be run - presumably Airnav can confirm how frequently the server is updated.  This will replace the old process of downloading the database update each month.

But remember, if you have autopopulate turned on, as routes expire (after 3 months) they will be updated from the server automatically in the same way they always have.  If you want to force an update, simply delete the route from the routes table in database explorer and next time the FlightID appears, the route will autopopulate from the server.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: RodBearden on October 19, 2013, 01:29:26 PM
It's all working fine here - I like the new grid sorting indicator - can someone explain this feature from the list:

"Allow users to disable auto sort on main grid view" ?

Rod
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 01:31:23 PM
Quote from: RodBearden
It's all working fine here - I like the new grid sorting indicator - can someone explain this feature from the list:

"Allow users to disable auto sort on main grid view" ?
- Click heading once (BOLD) - sort ascending
- Click heading again (ITALIC) - sort descending
- Click heading again - turns OFF auto-sorting

One of the many little changes to RB5 ;)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: RodBearden on October 19, 2013, 01:32:22 PM
Aha - thanks, Tarbat!

Rod
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 19, 2013, 02:40:30 PM
Hi have a problem whit the new V5 software, it erases airplanes I had already caught the MyLog earlier, as in the case below.

and is very slow when I pass a plane to another in MyLog.

Regards
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 19, 2013, 02:51:51 PM
Try running Populate in the MyLog window.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 19, 2013, 03:04:09 PM
Hi Alan, Yes, I've closed right down (Shutdown of PC) and turned back on again getting a box displayed

"The application has encountered a problem.  We are sorry for the inconvenience" and a big red cross box.
In the box it says: "Cannot open file "C:\AirNav Systems\AirNav RadarBox\ANRB.dat". The system cannot find the file specified." To see what the data report contains, "Click Here" and an "OK" button.

This leads to Eureka Log 6.0.18  and a load of data information that it won't let me copy and paste
but I've tried a screen dump which hopefully be accessible to you.

EurekaLog 6.0.18

Application:
-------------------------------------------------------
  1.1 Start Date      : Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:47:00 +0100
  1.2 Name/Description: ANRB.exe
  1.3 Version Number  : 1.0.0.1253
  1.4 Parameters      :
  1.5 Compilation Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:18:37 +0100
  1.6 Up Time         : 36 seconds

Exception:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  2.1 Date          : Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:47:37 +0100
  2.2 Address       : 0042BC48
  2.3 Module Name   : ANRB.exe
  2.4 Module Version: 1.0.0.1253
  2.5 Type          : EFOpenError
  2.6 Message       : Cannot open file "C:\AirNav Systems\AirNav RadarBox\ANRB.dat". The system cannot find the file specified.
  2.7 ID            : 262E
  2.8 Count         : 1
  2.9 Status        : New
  2.10 Note         :

User:
-------------------------------------------------------
  3.1 ID        : Jon - TWH-1-TR12 7EP
  3.2 Name      :
  3.3 Email     :
  3.4 Company   :
  3.5 Privileges: SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege        - OFF
                  SeSecurityPrivilege             - OFF
                  SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege        - OFF
                  SeLoadDriverPrivilege           - OFF
                  SeSystemProfilePrivilege        - OFF
                  SeSystemtimePrivilege           - OFF
                  SeProfileSingleProcessPrivilege - OFF
                  SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege - OFF
                  SeCreatePagefilePrivilege       - OFF
                  SeBackupPrivilege               - OFF
                  SeRestorePrivilege              - OFF
                  SeShutdownPrivilege             - OFF
                  SeDebugPrivilege                - OFF
                  SeSystemEnvironmentPrivilege    - OFF
                  SeChangeNotifyPrivilege         - ON
                  SeRemoteShutdownPrivilege       - OFF
                  SeUndockPrivilege               - OFF
                  SeManageVolumePrivilege         - OFF
                  SeImpersonatePrivilege          - ON
                  SeCreateGlobalPrivilege         - ON
                  SeIncreaseWorkingSetPrivilege   - OFF
                  SeTimeZonePrivilege             - OFF
                  SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege   - OFF

Active Controls:
---------------------------------------------------
  4.1 Form Class   : Tmainform
  4.2 Form Text    : AirNav RadarBox 3D - 5.00.044
  4.3 Control Class: MDIClient
  4.4 Control Text :

Computer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5.1 Name          : JONSLAPTOP
  5.2 Total Memory  : 4094 Mb
  5.3 Free Memory   : 2828 Mb
  5.4 Total Disk    : 100.49 Gb
  5.5 Free Disk     : 59.72 Gb
  5.6 System Up Time: 3 hours, 35 minutes, 41 seconds
  5.7 Processor     : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T7700  @ 2.40GHz
  5.8 Display Mode  : 1680 x 1050, 32 bit
  5.9 Display DPI   : 96
  5.10 Video Card   : NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT (driver 9.18.13.2049 - RAM 512 MB)
  5.11 Printer      : Epson AL-C1100 (driver 6.1.7600.16385)

Operating System:
------------------------------------------------
  6.1 Type    : Microsoft Windows Vista (64 bit)
  6.2 Build # : 7600
  6.3 Update  :
  6.4 Language: English
  6.5 Charset : 0

Network:
---------------------------------------------------
  7.1 IP Address: 000.000.000.000 - 192.168.001.080
  7.2 Submask   : 000.000.000.000 - 255.255.255.000
  7.3 Gateway   : 000.000.000.000 - 192.168.001.254
  7.4 DNS 1     : 000.000.000.000 - 192.168.001.254
  7.5 DNS 2     : 000.000.000.000 - 000.000.000.000
  7.6 DHCP      : ON              - ON             

and then a load of gobbledegook that it won't let me post as the message exceeds the maximum allowed length (20000 characters).
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 03:12:08 PM
just downloaded and installed the upgrade, everything seems to be working fine at first sight.
a couple of questions  ;

screenshot 002 ; will I loose any manual entry I made in the DB if I tick this option ? ore what do I have to expect it to do ?

screenshot 003 ; the header of the silhouette collom is missing ( not a big deal )

screenshot 004 ; IF I understand it right, setting these options will update all data in the DB, except the entry's I made manually, and if yes, how do the updater makes the difference between a "official" entry and a manual one ??

thanks in advance for some clarification ;-)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 03:15:33 PM
A new Navdata is run each night around midnight I dont know the exact time and is available for updating thereafter.  Any changes to the database made in the previous 24 hours since the last one was run will be incorporated

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 03:16:09 PM
Aerotower, to get 3D you require to subscribe to the 3D option.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 03:26:27 PM
another "new" thing I noticed : some flight ID's are longer then the collum width ( see the ones with a blue dot ), of course no way to enlarge the collum
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 03:31:41 PM
oeps, rather annoying problem : no more network !

get network flights is ticked, and connection to network is green, but nothing in the grid.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 03:32:41 PM
Vonsmalhousen

Re Scrrenshot 2  This relates to auto-updates when the individual aircraft is received.  If the box is ticked the details will be updated to the same as the server entry.  If unticked it will not be touched. 

I will forward the error with the silhoutte column header

Screenshot 4 refers to the whole databse as opposed to individual aircraft in screenshot 2

If the Navdata details are different from the server details it must have been manually updated.  If you tick or untick the boxes the tables are updated or not depending on your preferences.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 03:33:46 PM
The network is OK here in Spain, maybe the network went dowen for a short time?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 03:36:21 PM
There is something wrong with those flight ID's they are incorrect.  Is your radarbox connected directly to your computer and via anther method?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 03:49:45 PM
John,

In your airnav/radarbox folder above ANRB.exe you should have a file, ANRB.dat.  Let me know if you have it

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: jpr89 on October 19, 2013, 03:57:24 PM
and is very slow when I pass a plane to another in MyLog.

Regards

Same problem here, but only with "old" data (before the upgrade to v.5). When I selected an aircraft contacted yesterday for example, it's very long and Mylog "isn't responding" for about 15-30 seconds, then it's ok.

Also, all the aircraft pictures downloaded before the update aren't appearing now?!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tommyg on October 19, 2013, 05:31:53 PM
Downloaded and seems to be ok. The only issue I came across was I had no map at all showing (don't use 3D) and only by chance clicked on the map view button top right of screen and map appeared. Everything else ok, I can even resize the preference windows for the first time without having to use resizenable.

tommyg
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 05:37:48 PM
just restarted my system  : still no network, and I still get these "wrong" flight ID's
my box is connected true a USB Hub to my PC, ..... like it always has been
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: AirNav Support on October 19, 2013, 05:51:01 PM
vonsmalhausen,

Something does seem wrong for your install, try backing up data and then clean the RadarBox folder and install the new full version again. Something looks like it has been corrupted.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 05:56:13 PM
ok, will do that
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 19, 2013, 06:06:14 PM
Hi Alan, Just done another complete shutdown and reboot, on trying to open ANRB I et a box with the message:

Cannot open file "C:\AirNav Systems\AirNav RadarBox\ANRB.dat". The system cannot find the file specified.

This would appear to confirm your suggestion, and I've not been able to locate it!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 06:12:43 PM
This one isn't related to Version 5 only, but does anyone else have this effect with B788s?

Alert Time: 2013.10.19 16:24:51
Received Aircraft: B788 (800734)
Received Aircraft: B788 (800734) <--

Total flight information:
Flight ID:
Registration: VT-ANN
Aircraft: B788
Routing:
Altitude: 38000
Speed:
Heading:

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 06:21:34 PM
Hi John,

I have been trying to attach the file to the post but  for some reason I cannot get it to attach.  Send me a PM with your email and I will post it to you.   It was in an earlier post but has disappeared.
Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 06:25:27 PM
ok, did a complete uninstall, and installed the full version instead of the upgrade, ......
still the same : no network ( the first time I launched, I was even back to delayed network ) aldo the light is green + still those long ID's for some flights
also I feel like I have a lot less "my flights" ; normally I get around 150+ hits round this time of the day/week, now "only" between 90 and 100.
really not pleased with this "update"
tomorrow i'll try to reverse back to the old version, if this is what we had to wait for the last years...........pffffffffff
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 06:29:01 PM
Just tried to open the submenu show all photos under MyLog. There are 36471 pictures in this folder. RB Software freeced with no reaction. After a while windows stated the "no reaction" message and performed a crowbar shut down of software. After re-start all screen settings were back to condition of first start after update.

MyLog was left filled. Autopopulated airframes were still in navdatabase.

Problem is repoduceable.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Kenny on October 19, 2013, 06:43:09 PM
The  VTBD label on 2D map is now corrected, however, still no VTBS label (see attach).
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 19, 2013, 06:53:26 PM
uninstalled version 5, and reinstalled version 4 : network back on again and no more strange ID's
applied the update again....... network gone again
this is defenatly a version 5 problem
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 06:58:07 PM
I dont have anywhere near 36471 photos in my folder but it still takes a while for all my photos to open.  Even thought it showed not responding it still opened up when I just tried it, even if it took some time.  37,000 photos is a lot of data to open up and will take a while to open them all up

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 07:00:15 PM
Is it possible, that your firewall -if you are using one- is having a problem with version 5?

Own problem:

Log and altert sending by using own mail account ist not working. Mail/alert via Server is working. Mail Account configuration in ANRB is identical to mail program. Firewall comsettings of ANRB and Mail program altered to identical settings. I gettting still the sent failed notification from ANRB software.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 07:04:47 PM
Kenny,

That part has not been sorted yet.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: EK01 on October 19, 2013, 07:06:01 PM
Alan,

I have the exact same problem as CoastGuardJon with the same long screed of fault messages. I also have to use the Task Manager to close the thing down. Beginning now to feel a bit like vonsmalhausen. I can't even get the original version back on.

Giving up and closing down. What a waste of time !

Ian
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 07:06:34 PM
Ingo,

Even although your getting the sent failed notification, did the mail get sent.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 07:07:10 PM
Ian,

Contact me by email

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 07:08:55 PM
Quote
I dont have anywhere near 36471 photos in my folder but it still takes a while for all my photos to open.  Even thought it showed not responding it still opened up when I just tried it, even if it took some time.  37,000 photos is a lot of data to open up and will take a while to open them all up
This is a known fact and I gave the V5 twice the time V4 had needed to open the pictures. Maybe I should rename the folder and start with a blanc one. Last time I flushed the folder was about three years ago, so many airframe pictures will be already outdated by now too.

I have about 27000 (22000 in the past 280 days on the 24/7 box) airframes in my MyLog. Two pictures for each airframe...

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 07:11:04 PM
Mail haven't been sent. No rise in upload traffic, No mail received with destination address. Switched back to server mode and tried again. Rise in uplaod traffic and LOG/Data received, no "sent failed" notification.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 07:13:08 PM
Thanks Ingo

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 07:32:08 PM
The naming of the donwloaded photo has changed withing V5:

G-CIVZ-QHFOAUPJDX.jpg
G-CIVZ-U2GWCD9SBC.jpg

is it still possible to insert individual ones in the old reg / reg,2 format?

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 07:44:10 PM
Yes Ingo,  photo's can still be added manually as before.  However I believe you have to add the aircraft registration into the PTTN and PTTN2 fields as well.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 07:46:39 PM
Good to know.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 08:01:39 PM
Is it correct, that flight data received by V5 Software is not used to feed RB24 Website?

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Mark Coles on October 19, 2013, 08:16:18 PM
what does it mean that the database has been encrypted and what is the purpose/advantage, tried to run some script and it failed because db is encrypted

thanks,
Mark
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 08:19:34 PM
No incorrect Ingo,

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 08:20:21 PM
It is encrypted to ensure that it cannot be used outside the application

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 08:33:04 PM
Quote from: Alan
No incorrect Ingo,

Alan
Well, then there seems to be a problem with my V5 on the desktop PC. Sharing is on, but no flights of this box is shown on RB24. Although I send my 24/7 PC into its weekly reboot. Ususally the flights are shared 60/40 (40 from 24/7 if the "big" one is on) if both machines are running. And if the 24/7 is going down for a weekly reboot 100% of shared flights are provided by desktop PC.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 08:44:01 PM
Hi Ingo,

If flights are shared with the network they should go to RB24 as it uses the network data.  Have you created an account on RB24 and linked your box?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 08:57:54 PM
Both boxes were linked for several month. I've used the update function of V5 software. Username and password of previously V4.03 version were automatically used to logon the ANRB V5 software after updating. Also the open and auto connect/logon function of the desktop link has worked flawlessly. Maybe its a firewall problem. I'll look what happens, if switch it off for a few minutes.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 09:07:02 PM
I would check the RB24 accounts settings as well.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 09:13:31 PM
RB24 settings already checke and re-entered to be shure. No effect. Switching off firewall: no effect. Reboot system and Software: No effect. Will wait to swicht to V5 on 24/7 machine until V5 -> RB24 connection is working for me. Deeper/further testing is difficult as I'm not at home and using remote acces to the RB computers.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 09:19:28 PM
The interesting thing is, that the V5 user id is the one with the expired network account. As the autopopulate/route update function is working, the box seems to be identified as a valid sharer by the AN servers. But for some reason the retrieved data isn't used for RB24 website and maybe the RB network. Maybe time will tell.

Good night and goodbye for today!

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: BlinkNFG on October 19, 2013, 09:20:47 PM
Hi,

Thanks to everyone for their hard work on the update.  I have downloaded and installed V5 fine.  A significant improvement.

I do though continue to have a bug (I also had this in the previous version).  I thought (perhaps mistakenly) that this would be solved by the "The Spurious Position Bug" being fixed.  The issue I have is with landing aircraft.  At Stansted and Luton (my nearest airports) I can track these to a relatively low altitude (around 2,500 feet) before they time out.  However occasionally (maybe every 5-6 aircraft) after the aircraft has time out it is re-detected around 30 seconds later for 1-2 seconds but this time with an erroneous altitude (can be up to 36,000 feet).  As a result the end altitude for that flight in my log is shown as incorrect.

Jon
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 09:22:53 PM
Thanks Jon,

I will pass on your report to the developer for further action.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 19, 2013, 09:27:56 PM
With V4.03 I have this problem several times a day, too. To few landings in EDDV until now to tell if I still have it with V5.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: mikek on October 19, 2013, 10:03:51 PM
I still have the following problem (that also existed on V4.03). On my Vista(...) computer, RB crashes whenever I return to from the screensaver or lock screen. It only occurs after I have installed MS Office 2010. As soon as I unstall Office, the crash does not occur. I am running as an administor. The following details come up:

Problem signature:
  Problem Event Name:   APPCRASH
  Application Name:   ANRB.exe
  Application Version:   1.0.0.1253
  Application Timestamp:   2a425e19
  Fault Module Name:   StackHash_3369
  Fault Module Version:   6.0.6002.18881
  Fault Module Timestamp:   51da3e27
  Exception Code:   c0000374
  Exception Offset:   000b06fc
  OS Version:   6.0.6002.2.2.0.768.3
  Locale ID:   5129
  Additional Information 1:   3369
  Additional Information 2:   6673edbfde6d717a58fc95c595104f9b
  Additional Information 3:   74e5
  Additional Information 4:   5e586a554cbda959b7ff88ccb1322b0d


I also operate RB sometimes on my laptop (Windows 8 64bit) with Office 2010 installed and this does not occur.

Mike
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 19, 2013, 10:13:09 PM
Thanks Mike, logged

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 19, 2013, 10:29:43 PM
After update I have lost some of the planes in MyLog, like registration, Company name, etc...

And now my report see like this,

Code: [Select]
Report generated by AirNav RadarBox - 5.00.044

 * 4841D8  TRA6608  LPFR-EHEH                                             2013/10/19 20:00:33 
 * 4841DB  TRA6203  EHEH-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:59:34 
 * 4841DB  TRA5956  LPPT-EHAM                                             2013/10/19 21:16:39 
 * 4844B1  P4BFL                                                          2013/10/19 17:55:32 
 * 484EE5  TRA503                                                         2013/10/19 17:06:43 
 * 484EE5  TRA504   LEMH-EHAM                                             2013/10/19 21:55:07 
 * 485009  TRA5951  EHAM-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 00:00:00 
 * 485009  TRA5952  LPPT-EHAM                                             2013/10/19 00:01:55 
 * 485009  TRA533   EHAM-GCTS                                             2013/10/19 15:47:08 
 * 485009  TRA534                                                         2013/10/19 20:04:52 
 * 491165  NJE947W                                                        2013/10/19 16:31:07 
 * 4951B7  TAP839   LIRF-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 15:34:21 
 * 4951B7  TAP438   LPPT-LFPO                                             2013/10/19 18:03:19 
 * 4951B7  TAP449   LFPO-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 22:40:39 
 * 4951C7  TAP576C  LPPT-EDDF                                             2013/10/19 15:50:28 
 * 4951C7  TAP579   EDDF-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 21:56:19 
 * 4951C9  TAP759   EKCH-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 10:51:59 
 * 4951C9  TAP441   LFPO-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 17:25:00 
 * 4951C9  TAP358A  LPPT-EGLL                                             2013/10/19 19:08:17 
 * 4951CB  TAP921   LSZH-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 13:01:35 
 * 4951CB  TAP436   LPPT-LFPO                                             2013/10/19 15:02:54 
 * 4951CB  TAP431   LFPO-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:32:11 
 * 4951CB  TAP1048  LPPT-LEBL                                             2013/10/19 21:06:17 
 * 4951CC  TAP757W  EKCH-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 17:47:36 
 * 4951CC  TAP448B  LPPT-LFPO                                             2013/10/19 19:36:44 
 * 4951D0  TAP1977  LPPR-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:25:04 
 * 4951D0  TAP838J  LPPT-LIRF                                             2013/10/19 20:53:04 
 * 4951D2  TAP537M  LPPT-EDDB                                             2013/10/19 17:18:09 
 * 4951D2  TAP566   LPPT-EDDH                                             2013/10/19 18:41:04 
 * 4951D3  TAP798   LPPT-EFHK                                             2013/10/19 11:44:30 
 * 4951D3  TAP793   EFHK-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 21:18:17 
 * 4951D3  TAP796   LPPT-EFHK                                             2013/10/19 22:54:50 
 * 4951D6  TAP1978  LPPT-LPPR                                             2013/10/19 16:55:05 
 * 495201  TAP478   LPPT-LFLL                                             2013/10/19 14:58:44 
 * 495203  TAP1981  LPPR-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 16:14:55 
 * 495203                                                                 2013/10/19 21:20:27 
 * 495204  TAP433   LFPO-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:38:49 
 * 495204  TAP496   LPPT-LFBO                                             2013/10/19 16:25:26 
 * 495204  TAP493   LFBO-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:43:22 
 * 495204  TAP2690                                                        2013/10/19 21:45:08 
 * 495206  TAP1956  LPPT-LPPR                                             2013/10/19 11:03:12 
 * 495206  TAP1018  LPPT-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 19:16:59 
 * 495206  TAP1019  LEMD-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 21:26:24 
 * 495207  TAP1097  LEVC-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 11:44:28 
 * 495207  TAP1042  LPPT-LEBL                                             2013/10/19 13:19:37 
 * 495207  TAP1043  LEBL-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 16:59:08 
 * 495207  TAP1046  LPPT-LEBL                                             2013/10/19 18:44:08 
 * 495207  TAP1047  LEBL-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 22:08:18 
 * 495209  TAP409   LFML-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 13:01:07 
 * 495209  TAP484   LPPT-LFMN                                             2013/10/19 14:39:07 
 * 495209  TAP487   LFMN-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:26:42 
 * 495209  TAP1980  LPPT-LPPR                                             2013/10/19 21:01:36 
 * 49520B  TAP464   LPPT-LFBD                                             2013/10/19 15:45:07 
 * 49520B  TAP469   LFBD-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:16:13 
 * 49520B  TAP1090  LPPT-LEVC                                             2013/10/19 21:14:58 
 * 49520C                                                                 2013/10/19 10:51:02 
 * 49520C  TAP1015  LEMD-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:35:30 
 * 49520C  TAP249   DAAG-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 20:25:02 
 * 49520E  TAP1041  LEBL-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 13:01:08 
 * 49520E  TAP237   GMMN-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 18:00:37 
 * 49520E  TAP486   LPPT-LFMN                                             2013/10/19 20:50:10 
 * 495224  TAP787B  ESSA-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 18:24:39 
 * 495224  TAP552   LPPT-EDDM                                             2013/10/19 20:18:40 
 * 495282  TAP561   EDDH-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:40:08 
 * 495282  TAP1016  LPPT-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 16:20:19 
 * 495282  TAP1021  LEMD-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 18:40:21 
 * 495282  TAP942   LPPT-LSGG                                             2013/10/19 20:24:23 
 * 495283  TAP329   EGCC-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:35:01 
 * 495283  TAP356   LPPT-EGLL                                             2013/10/19 16:08:51 
 * 495283  TAP377   EGLL-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 21:30:30 
 * 495285  TAP1908  LPFR-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 11:44:28 
 * 495285  TAP344L  LPPT-EGKK                                             2013/10/19 13:01:08 
 * 495285  TAP341   EGKK-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 18:15:09 
 * 495285  TAP668   LPPT-EHAM                                             2013/10/19 20:10:43 
 * 495286  TAP573J  EDDF-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 15:32:30 
 * 495286  TAP364   LPPT-EGLL                                             2013/10/19 17:14:04 
 * 495286  TAP367A  EGLL-LPAR                                             2013/10/19 22:06:12 
 * 495287  TAP1828  LPLA-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 00:00:00 
 * 495287                                                                 2013/10/19 10:50:57 
 * 495287  TAP359G  EGLL-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 15:51:23 
 * 495287  TAP9316                                                        2013/10/19 19:43:15 
 * 495288  TAP714   LPPT-LHBP                                             2013/10/19 15:53:38 
 * 495288  TAP713   LHBP-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 22:41:20 
 * 49528A  TAP761   ENGM-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 17:20:41 
 * 49528A  TAP928   LPPT-LSZH                                             2013/10/19 19:28:35 
 * 49528B  TAP947   LSGG-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 13:01:08 
 * 49528B  TAP804   LPPT-LIMC                                             2013/10/19 14:34:23 
 * 49528B  TAP809   LIMC-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 19:38:19 
 * 49528B  TAP1022  LPPT-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 21:18:30 
 * 49528D  TAP373   EGLL-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:34:26 
 * 49528D  TAP612   LPPT-EBBR                                             2013/10/19 17:55:23 
 * 49528E  TAP722   LPPT-LROP                                             2013/10/19 00:00:00 
 * 49528E  TAP801   LIMC-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:53:02 
 * 49528E  TAP614   LPPT-EBBR                                             2013/10/19 16:54:47 
 * 49528E  TAP619   EBBR-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 22:02:24 
 * 4B161E  EDW298   LSZH-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 17:50:21 
 * 4B161E  EDW299   LPFR-LSZH                                             2013/10/19 19:42:19 
 * 4CA13D  EIN494   EIDW-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 16:22:08 
 * 4CA13D  EIN495   LPFR-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 19:04:18 
 * 4CA15C  EIN778   EIDW-GCRR                                             2013/10/19 16:52:30 
 * 4CA15C  EIN77M   GCRR-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 21:40:45 
 * 4CA246  RYR5278  LEMD-GCXO                                             2013/10/19 17:00:20 
 * 4CA246  RYR5279  GCXO-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 21:53:41 
 * 4CA294  EIN484   EIDW-LPPT                                             2013/10/19 14:38:19 
 * 4CA294  EIN485   LPPT-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 17:00:29 
 * 4CA2C9  EIN770   EIDW-GCFV                                             2013/10/19 18:01:26 
 * 4CA2C9  EIN771   GCFV-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 22:47:01 
 * 4CA2D4  RYR53W   EIDW-GCLP                                             2013/10/19 16:26:50 
 * 4CA2D4  RYR12GM  GCLP-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 21:25:38 
 * 4CA640  EIN883   LEMG-EICK                                             2013/10/19 11:20:38 
 * 4CA640  EIN876   EICK-GCRR                                             2013/10/19 16:10:51 
 * 4CA640  EIN877   GCRR-EICK                                             2013/10/19 20:45:15 
 * 4CA73A  RYR62MU  EDLV-GCRR                                             2013/10/19 15:50:28 
 * 4CA73A  RYR6MQ   GCRR-EDLV                                             2013/10/19 20:40:31 
 * 4CA760  RYR2573  LEMG-LEST                                             2013/10/19 19:40:05 
 * 4CA762  RYR1KW   EGSS-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 19:18:13 
 * 4CA762  RYR26VA  LPFR-EGSS                                             2013/10/19 21:17:02 
 * 4CA7B3  RYR31GD  EGGD-GCLP                                             2013/10/19 13:04:06 
 * 4CA7B3  RYR2011  LEMD-GCLP                                             2013/10/19 18:32:38 
 * 4CA891  RYR6312  EBCI-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 12:00:52 
 * 4CA891  RYR5487  LPFR-LPPR                                             2013/10/19 13:39:18 
 * 4CA891  RYR5486  LPPR-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 14:59:22 
 * 4CA891  RYR36GQ  LPFR-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 16:57:37 
 * 4CA891  RYR36GQ  LPFR-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 21:43:55 
 * 4CA891  RYR97LA  EIDW-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 21:50:18 
 * 4CA894  RYR4XZ   EGSS-GCLP                                             2013/10/19 16:26:50 
 * 4CA894  RYR8TW   GCLP-EGSS                                             2013/10/19 21:28:53 
 * 4CA8E6  RYR6XH   EGNM-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 14:44:09 
 * 4CA8E6  RYR86EC  LPFR-EGGD                                             2013/10/19 17:20:24 
 * 4CA8E6  RYR39YC  EGGD-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 21:38:36 
 * 4CA8E7  RYR7442  ESKN-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 16:03:23 
 * 4CA8E7  RYR9LQ   LPFR-EGNX                                             2013/10/19 17:47:47 
 * 4CA8E7  RYR7BK   EGNX-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 22:51:55 
 * 4CA8E9  RYR63CH  EGHH-GCLP                                             2013/10/19 13:30:49 
 * 4CA8E9  RYR7003  GCLP-LEST                                             2013/10/19 18:31:16 
 * 4CA8E9  RYR7004  LEST-GCLP                                             2013/10/19 20:22:20 
 * 4CA8EB  RYR51XA  EGGP-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 14:34:23 
 * 4CA8EB  RYR4VT   LPFR-EGBB                                             2013/10/19 16:37:57 
 * 4CA8EB  RYR4LJ   EGBB-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 21:30:42 
 * 4CA90F  RYR8PT   LPFR-EGSS                                             2013/10/19 17:43:24 
 * 4CA90F  RYR1TA   EGSS-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 22:42:04 
 * 4CA911                                                                 2013/10/19 20:37:15 
 * 4CA935  EIN774   EIDW-GMAD                                             2013/10/19 18:51:10 
 * 4CA935  EIN775   GMAD-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 22:55:53 
 * 4CA947  EIN498   EIDW-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 18:35:00 
 * 4CA947  EIN49T   UUEE-KJFK                                             2013/10/19 20:37:45 
 * 4CA96B  RYR72CX  EIKN-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 14:00:41 
 * 4CA96B  RYR5KM   LPFR-EGCC                                             2013/10/19 16:05:11 
 * 4CA96B  RYR6AW   EGCC-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 21:23:13 
 * 4CA96C  RYR97JQ  EGGP-GCRR                                             2013/10/19 16:59:50 
 * 4CA96C  RYR6KB   GCRR-EGGP                                             2013/10/19 21:20:50 
 * 4CA96E  RYR1991  GCTS-LEXJ                                             2013/10/19 19:10:30 
 * 4CA96E  RYR2904  LEXJ-GCTS                                             2013/10/19 21:41:21 
 * 4CA9CC  RYR6DU   EIDW-GCRR                                             2013/10/19 16:10:20 
 * 4CA9CC  RYR7T    GCRR-EIDW                                             2013/10/19 21:00:31 
 * 4CA9CD  RYR5712  EDFH-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 15:10:35 
 * 4CA9CD  RYR6165  LPFR-EDLV                                             2013/10/19 17:35:14 
 * 4CA9CD  RYR6164  EDLV-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 23:12:31 
 * 4CA9ED  RYR7XY   EGGP-GCFV                                             2013/10/19 17:11:26 
 * 4CA9ED  RYR9AH   GCFV-EGGP                                             2013/10/19 21:44:44 
 * 4CAA57  RYR9VF   GCTS-EGPH                                             2013/10/19 21:11:35 
 * 4CAA61  RYR7469  EHBK-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 13:01:08 
 * 4CAA61  RYR7481  LPFR-EDJA                                             2013/10/19 14:53:12 
 * 4CAA61  RYR7482  EDJA-LPFR                                             2013/10/19 20:15:37 
 * 4D00F8                                                                 2013/10/19 17:46:45 
 * 4D209B                                                                 2013/10/19 18:02:26 
 * 502C8F  TCX17VE                                                        2013/10/19 14:59:46 
 * ACB177                                                                 2013/10/19 16:24:20 
 * AD8EDE  AVA010                                                         2013/10/19 13:04:06 
 * AD8EDE  AVA017   LEMD-SKRG                                             2013/10/19 16:10:36 
 * E02354  ARG1132  SAEZ-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 17:01:04 
 * E02354  ARG1132  SAEZ-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 22:31:51 
 * E02354  ARG1133  LEMD-SAEZ                                             2013/10/19 22:33:07 
 * E80420  LPE2706  SPIM-LEMD                                             2013/10/19 16:34:37 
 * 896173  UAE191   OMDB-LPPT       A6-EWA     B77L  Emirates             2013/10/19 14:34:41 
 * 896173                           A6-EWA     B77L  Emirates             2013/10/19 18:21:19 
 * E8040F  LAN704   SCEL-LEMD-EDDF  CC-BBB     B788  LAN Airlines         2013/10/19 11:22:31 
 * E80276  LAN9901                  CC-BFS     A320  LAN Airlines         2013/10/19 11:09:27
 New Aircraft entries have the symbol *

--- End of Report ---


I have select the autopopulate in preferences.

But I'm so disapointed.......
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: BlinkNFG on October 19, 2013, 10:40:20 PM
Thanks Alan

Jon
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: cosmefulanito on October 20, 2013, 01:38:31 AM
After update I can't share data to RB24 and I can't see netwok data flights.
I've reinstall many times the soft and still have the same problem.

Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Kenny on October 20, 2013, 03:12:16 AM
Quote from: Kenny
- Report shows all contact are new contact
Checked, and reproduced.  Logged on bug tracker (FS#237).

After rolling to the next day after upgrade to 5.00.044.  All flights still 'new' flights.

Kenny
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Kenny on October 20, 2013, 03:13:39 AM
Mail haven't been sent. No rise in upload traffic, No mail received with destination address. Switched back to server mode and tried again. Rise in uplaod traffic and LOG/Data received, no "sent failed" notification.

Ingo

Mine both manually send and schedule send are working.

Kenny
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: mikek on October 20, 2013, 04:10:51 AM
As a few others have already noted, I have sharing ticked, but none of my contacts are showing on RB24.com. Under my stats on RB24, I am at 0 every hour since I upgraded this morning my time.
I am unsure for the network as I don't subscribe.

It doesn't really bother me too much, so long as it isn't affecting my ability to download database updates etc...

Mike
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 05:17:44 AM
Same here. No flight in my stats since the upgrade 19/10 ~0715Z.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: AirNav Development on October 20, 2013, 06:54:22 AM
We are checking the RB24 upload problem.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Roadrunner on October 20, 2013, 07:41:49 AM
Sorry didnt get back to you yesterday but I have now got the 2d version running. It was so long since last used RB that I had forgotten that Map view (top right) is the 2D version and when I pressed it first time round I had to wait a good 30 seconds for anything to happen. All OK now.
Mike


Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 20, 2013, 08:00:00 AM
still no network flights for me
today I uninstalled again version 4 ( that is working perfectly after reinstall yesterday ) with a uninstall program ( Revo uninstaller ) to get rid of possible traces left by the standard program uninstaller.
after that I redownloaded the full installer, to rule out the possibility of a corrupted download of the precedent
installed the full version of v5 ; still no network and wrong flight id's
checked my firewall ( Norton 360 ) and the only entry I could find for ANRB has full access
the network light is green, and there is connection to the server, as it does download missing photos and yesterday I tried the update function witch seemed to work
BUT, even with this supposing "clean install" my account name and password are already filled in on start-up, also my homestation details are already filled in ; so there has to be something in the register that escapes to the uninstall process, maybe it is this that creates my problem ; how can I find and remove this file ?
 
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 20, 2013, 08:14:00 AM
Just checked RB24 and now there some entries from my V5 driven box in statistics now:

Sat 16:00UTC 0,0275
Sun 04:00UTC 0,0089
Sun 07:00UTC 0,0177

rest still blanc.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: AirNav Development on October 20, 2013, 08:16:09 AM
This problem (RB500 not sharing to RB24.com) should be corrected now. Please confirm.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: mikek on October 20, 2013, 08:22:19 AM
Yip, all corrected. My data is now showing on RB24.com
Mike
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 08:37:57 AM
Yes, it's ok.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: AirNav Development on October 20, 2013, 08:38:34 AM
For users of both the RadarBox Windows Software and RadarBox24.com / Apps: which ideas would like to see implemented on the RB24 system to give you (sharers) a more customized experience with the system? Statistics of shared data? Filter by your own received flights?

Send us some ideas so we can do some brain storming here and come up with more interesting features.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: mikek on October 20, 2013, 08:47:22 AM
Does v5 allow more than three airports to be entered for a route? If not, I think it would be useful to be able to add more to the 'via' column to allow the full route of some routes to be shown.

Mike
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 20, 2013, 08:57:31 AM
Yes, seems to work now. Will monitor throughout the day.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 20, 2013, 09:47:22 AM
Well, I took the plunge, and uninstalled RB and tried to delete any and everything with an AN or possible RB connection, and tried installing the new "Full installation" program which seemed to go OK, however when I now try to start RB, I get the normal very slow response with the green box checking for RB1 then RB2 etc. and eventually when the screen sorts itself out, I appear to have RB open, but totally inoperable - just a screen full of the start screen for Google Earth - any suggestions folks?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 20, 2013, 10:36:49 AM
is it really only me who has this network problem with v5 ????!!!!!!!!!
after several attempts of uninstalling, reinstalling and updating, I give up
just reinstalled version 4.03 ( you know, "the buggy one" ) and everything runs like it is supposed to be.
to give a answer to the question in the title of this topic ; "Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044", I can tell you : EXTREMELY bad and VERRY, VERRY, VERRY DISSAPOINTED !!!!!!!
and now there will be no more updates to the DB to download anymore, so in a couple of months ( weeks ) my box will be completely obsolete, Thank You Airnav
guess it's time to look out for a SBS3.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 10:40:50 AM
John,

What happens when you press the map view button

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 10:42:58 AM
John,

Can you also advise the path of your previous installation and the path of the new installation please.

Thanks

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 10:49:36 AM
Mike,

Noted, still only 3 at this time

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 10:50:22 AM
In my flights, when I click on the line of 477FF1 (C17 01 from Strategic Airlift Capability), the photos shown are for 01-0015, although 01-U381FMI8QQ.jpg is present in the Photo folder.
AE123A (04-4128), right now on the screen, shows the new photo :(
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 10:53:16 AM
Ingo,

I have tried the Send Email Using Custom Server option as have others including users as detailed on the forum and this option is working OK.  Could you look at your settings and ensure that all the boxes under the option are completed correctly as per your email configuration.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 10:57:17 AM
Thanks Liviu, logged for correction.  The CH and PTTN fields are filled in when you download the photo.  These field are not completed in my Navdata as I have not picked up the aircraft and downloaded the photo.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: BlinkNFG on October 20, 2013, 12:41:56 PM
Hi,

The following bug does not seem to have been entirely fixed (at least for me):

"Aircraft not timing out"

I have attached an example.  In the screenshot the SHTL6L flight does not seem to have timed out correctly and has 'run into' the next flight by that registration - SHT7Z.

Jon
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 12:51:07 PM
Thanks again Jon, logged

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 01:12:34 PM
Before making the upgrade or doing the full install save your mylog and for re-use once you have upgraded.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 01:32:51 PM
vonsmalhausen,

Your problem doesnt seem to be affecting others as no other users have been on reporting loosing their internet connection.  The problem has been logged and will be looked into as soon as possible

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 01:43:37 PM
"Aircraft not timing out"
I can see that too, with the flights originated from LROP which return after < ~3 hours.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 01:48:43 PM
Thanks Liviu

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 20, 2013, 01:56:38 PM
Hi all, well, for me this has been an absolute waste of time - deleted all ANRB files and references, then downloaded and installed V.5, but if I open RB now, I get Google Earth opening page, which offers 3D view, got to map and close 3D - all I get is a grey screen with the usual toolbar at the top, which isn't of any use to man nor beast.   If I go into ANRB file nowhere can I find ANRB.exe  I give up!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 01:58:31 PM
What does pressing map view button do John

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 02:03:25 PM
Liviu,

These flight returning within 3 hours.  Can you confirm that you mean the same aircraft with a different flight ID.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Dana on October 20, 2013, 02:08:18 PM
Same problem here, or some flights appear as time out on the map during all flight.
And one question: why some ground equipment with ads-b not shown on map ? with other ADS-B receiver i can see on the map such as MLAT equipment on the airport. On RB appear in the flights list only...
A good thing that I noticed after upgrade is that the airplanes are moving with much more fluency on the map than before .
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 02:14:55 PM
Quote from: Dana
And one question: why some ground equipment with ads-b not shown on map ? with other ADS-B receiver i can see on the map such as MLAT equipment on the airport. On RB appear in the flights list only...
MLAT is not a feature that's currently available in Radarbox.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 02:20:24 PM
Quote from: Runway31
These flight returning within 3 hours.
Yes. Example attached. Flights ROT703/ROT704.

LE. And another example with less than 3 hours between rotations (WZZ1LY/WZZ8JV)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 02:31:38 PM
One more thing about the photos.
3DD806 (343 EC-135) does not have any photos on A.net, but a photo of a MiG-23 of the East Germany's Air Force has been freshly dowloaded (as it is specified in the database):
LK: http://www.airliners.net/photo/East-Germany--/Mikoyan-Gurevich-MiG-23ML/2276305/L/
CH: 20131020070010
PTTN: 343-131GGMAZJL
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 02:34:50 PM
Many thanks again Liviu.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 02:47:56 PM
Hi Liviu,

Thanks for bringing to my attention.  I have went went through the database 2 or 3 times and changed all the military aircraft showing the wrong photo to correct ones or where there were none available i added the photo not available link.  I can only suspect I missed this one, either that or the photo was added automatically by the system since the last time I checked.  I have removed the spurious links and replaced them with photo unavailable and would suggest you remove the offending photos from your folder and delete the links in the Navdata or carry out an update tomorrow and the change will be in the downloaded Navdata

There are lots of military aircraft in the database without links and some spurious ones will be downloaded from time to time.  There are too many aircraft in the databse for me to add photo links for each one which is liable to be downloaded wrongly.

Thanks again

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tommyg on October 20, 2013, 02:53:23 PM
Jon.
I had the same prob as you. ( I don't subscribe to 3D either). I downloaded all the google earth data then when my map screen appeared it was blank showing nothing at all even though the flight list was populating. I then hit the map view button and voila everything appeared on my map screen as it was in 4.03.
Hope that helps.

Tommyg
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 02:54:10 PM
Quote from: shouriken
Yes. Example attached. Flights ROT703/ROT704.

LE. And another example with less than 3 hours between rotations (WZZ1LY/WZZ8JV)

Both of these look like correct behaviour to me.  In the first example, YR-ATC changed FlightID sometime between 7:28am and 9:29am, and so RB started a new flight record when it first detected the new FlightID of ROT704.  In the second example, HA-LWQ changed FlightID sometime between 13:17 and 14:30 to WZZ8JV.  Remember, RB keeps the same FlightID until it receives the transmission of a new FlightID, which will typically be in response to a ModeS squitter from a base station.

Radarbox works to a 3 hour rule.  If any ModeS message is receive for an aircraft within 3 hours of the START date/time, it is considered to be the same flight UNLESS the FlightID is different.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: M on October 20, 2013, 03:10:21 PM
Quote from: tarbat
Radarbox works to a 3 hour rule.  If any ModeS message is receive for an aircraft within 3 hours of the START date/time, it is considered to be the same flight UNLESS the FlightID is different.
That makes no sense. Should be something like max 15 minutes.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 03:17:28 PM
Quote from: M
That makes no sense. Should be something like max 15 minutes.
Noted, something for us to consider, and has been added to the task list.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 20, 2013, 03:35:28 PM
I think 3 hours is too much.
See the private planes or helicopter, or military flights, with the same flightID all day, like register FlightID.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 03:39:10 PM
Quote from: Aerotower
I think 3 hours is too much.
I agree.

And this is the first time I hear about the "3 hours" rule :(
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 20, 2013, 04:35:16 PM
Hi TommyG, Thanks for that, I thought I was on my own again.   I still can't get any screen to display!   Which do you call the "map view button"?   I went into File - Database Explorer - Aircraft and only have 81800 entries whereas, before this wonderful V.5 it was something like 206,000!    No, I'm still not very impressed!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 04:37:01 PM
Quote from: CoastGuardJon
I went into File - Database Explorer - Aircraft and only have 81800 entries whereas, before this wonderful V.5 it was something like 206,000!
Once you're up and running, you can use the Database Updates tab in Database Explorer to download and import the latest database.
Quote from: CoastGuardJon
Which do you call the "map view button"?
On the toolbar, top right, there are three buttons - 3D View / Map View / Split View.  Click on the Map View button.  If you can't find the Map View button, then do MENU - WINDOW - CLOSE ALL.  Then do MENU - MAP - OPEN/SAVE - NEW MAP.  The do MENU - WINDOW - RECORD DESKTOP.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 04:43:11 PM
Jon,

I have posted at least 2 messages on this thread suggesting you press the map view button, replies 108 and 121

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 20, 2013, 04:51:14 PM
This continue to apear....

Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 04:54:10 PM
Quote from: Aerotower
This continue to apear....
How long did it stay like that before the registration and actype appeared in the list?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CYYZGUY on October 20, 2013, 04:57:48 PM
I hear of all these people having problems....I have not had one issue other then the radar rings not appearing.  To me that's minor and will get fixed.  Has anyone else had a smooth install like myself?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 05:07:16 PM
Quote from: CYYZGUY
I hear of all these people having problems....I have not had one issue other then the radar rings not appearing.  To me that's minor and will get fixed.  Has anyone else had a smooth install like myself?

That's really good to hear.  Hopefully there are many others happily using the new version without significant problems.  I would expect any beta release to generate some errors, but hopefully not too many "show-stoppers".  We've logged around 15 bugs on the Airnav internal task tracking system, and they'll all be looked at in due course.  As an early beta tester it's always disappointing when you realise you missed a bug during early beta testing before public release, but some things do depend on local PC configuration and especially local Radarbox setup and reception conditions.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 20, 2013, 05:14:03 PM
Hi Alan, I've quadruple checked the setting, temporaryly switched off all firewall/antivirus software. But custom mail is not working with my yahoo mail nor with my aol mail. I've setup sev eral mail configurations in my life and its not to difficult to do this.

enter user id, password (authorization required) set port, select ssl if needed (and it is needed with my accounts), enter smtp server, check in firewall if the selected port is valid/active for the used software.  Until now it has alwas worked with the first shot (several smartphones, labtops with several different mail programs) I don't think that I'm doing something wrong. Maybe it's the combination or ANRB software itself.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 20, 2013, 05:25:14 PM
I had similar problems as others upgrading so did a complete uninstall and then installed a complete new V5 therefore loosing all the personalization. Is there a simple way of replacing home data, map settings, etc. please?
Dave.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 05:26:53 PM
neroon79, can you post a screenshot of your settings (hide the sensitive bits) - Like this:

maybe it's the SSL bit that's a problem - I haven't tested with SSL.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 05:29:23 PM
Quote from: tarbat
As an early beta tester it's always disappointing when you realise you missed a bug during early beta testing before public release
I know that feeling...
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 20, 2013, 05:32:20 PM
"How long did it stay like that before the registration and actype appeared in the list?"

Since start, until lose it.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 05:36:46 PM
Quote from: Aerotower
Since start, until lose it.
Okay, I've logged it as a bug on the tracking system (FS#250).
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 20, 2013, 05:41:05 PM
It is necessary for me to use port 465 and SSL

Name Last Name
[email protected]
smtp.mail.yahoo.com
smtp port: 465 (standard SSL port for yahoo. also tried with aol settings and port 587)
ticked: SMTP requires SSL (is forced by yahoo since last week)
ticked: SMTP requires authorisation
[email protected]
password

Screenshots are not possible at the moment as I'm in an area with EDGE www access only.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 05:44:22 PM
Aerotower,

I note you are not connected to the Network, do you share?

Also under Preferances/Radarbox do you have Callsign and Squawk validation ticked, if so does unticking make any difference?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Aerotower on October 20, 2013, 05:49:02 PM
Yes Alan, I share data.

And I have ticked and unticked for some time and nothing.

And Auto Update Manually changed records is ticked.

And another thing
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 20, 2013, 05:51:03 PM
Thank you Tommy, Chris and Alan, I was looking for a Map View button under the "Map" heading, I hadn't even looked at the rest of the toolbar, I'm now up and running, just need to update the db.    Sorry Alan, there's been so many replies on this topic, I hadn't read each one individually.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 05:51:15 PM
neroon79, thanks.  Might be SSL related.  Anyway, this is logged as a bug (FS#242), so will be looked at.  In the meantime, continue to use the Airnav server for sending emails.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 05:52:24 PM
No worries Jon, just glad you are up and running.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 05:56:36 PM
Ingo,

I note on your email settings the under smtp.mail.yahoo.com  you have a dot before mail.  Is that a typo as I  dont think it should be there.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 20, 2013, 06:07:54 PM
Well, I thought I was up and running, obviously detecting some a/c, but nothing being displayed on the map, although reception lines expanding!   Can't even see if I've got network working or not........
I'm giving up for tonight, and watching the box instead - enough frustration!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 06:14:44 PM
Jon,

Check that on the network page, Get flights from network, bottom left of the grid is ticked.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 06:20:27 PM
Hi Dave,

Unfortunately nor, as its an new install you will need to start again, fortunately it doesnt take long to set up the screen the way you want it.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: shouriken on October 20, 2013, 06:35:58 PM
"My Log" and/or "Reporter" window and sub-windows do not remember size and position between ANRB.exe program sessions.

PS. Note that they never did it, but maybe they should.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 20, 2013, 06:41:16 PM
smtp.mail.yahoo.com is correct, as it is copied from Yahoo website and working with my mail program(s).

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 06:53:58 PM
Ingo, have you tried port 25?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 06:54:42 PM
Hi Ingo,

Just wondered as my ISP doesnt have the smtp or the dot just mail.btinternet.com so thought it was worthwhile trying without it.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 20, 2013, 07:04:46 PM
I tried all ports and ssl non ssl combinations, as far as it was possible or supported by my mail providers. Maybe I look for another freemail provider that is allowing ssl free comunication to figure out if the problem is indeed ssl related.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 20, 2013, 07:09:53 PM
neroon79, I've now confirmed this is an SSL problem.  I re-configured my email account to use SSL, and whilst I can send okay with SSL from Outlook, sending with SSL from Radarbox fails.  So, an SSL problem.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: superspotter on October 20, 2013, 07:33:53 PM
Hi Guys;
I would just like to mention that, being a computer thicky, I updated the program an hour ago and apart from being surprised upon launching the program and seeing Google Earth instead of a map, within seconds I saw the toolbar with map view and was delighted to find pretty much everything working the way I like it as in the previous version! I have one minor question though, I read in this thread that I could manually input my own photos when they are missing, especially when I am sat in Lagos not many of the local carriers pop up with recent pics. How do I manually insert a pic? I assume that by inserting a pic, it would be for my system only? It would be nice to have them uploaded to the network but I assume that wouldn't happen? Hope you don't mind me asking here.
kind regards clive.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 20, 2013, 08:23:53 PM
Hi Clive,

Unfortunately the photos would be for your eyes only.

You would require to make them size 200x134 and name them the registration.jpg and place them in the data/photo folder.  A second phot would be registration,2.jpg
They should then should show next time you pick them up.  You may also have to add the registration in the PTTN/PTTN2 field via d/b explorer,

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Dana on October 21, 2013, 07:17:19 AM
After upgrade I noticed less airplane on the map then before. Or on Flight list are ADS-B airplanes but not shown on the map. Also range has diminished in some areas. I also noticed that if I set the time out flight less than 4 sec. all airplanes on the map looks like time out flights.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 21, 2013, 04:30:45 PM
Thanks for testing tarbat. Maybe I'll look for an SSL free mail provider. On the other hand, if sending by using the airnav server is working with a much higher reliability as in V4, I won't need a custom mail...

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 21, 2013, 09:31:01 PM
MikeK

Regarding your issue with Office10, please see PM sent

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 22, 2013, 12:44:57 PM
Just getting things back to the way I had before V5, but can`t remember how to set up auto start on Vista please.
Dave.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 22, 2013, 04:26:19 PM
Copy link into autostart folder.
right mouse click on link, go to an click on "eigenschaften"
select submenu "Verknüpfung"

Under target (Ziel) enter this "C:\Eigene Programme\AirNav Systems\AirNav RadarBox\ANRB.exe" /connect

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tommyg on October 22, 2013, 08:42:47 PM
Alan/support.

Have downloaded 5044 and 47 with no problems, however tonight after my box had been running just under 4 hours I  got an 'access violation with anrb.exe' error and the box shut down. I have restarted it and it is working normally again. so no idea what caused the fault.

tommyg
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: KB1CHU on October 22, 2013, 08:43:51 PM
I like that you can go directly to RadarBox24 from the software. I do find myself going back and forth sometimes. Steve KB1CHU
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 22, 2013, 10:26:10 PM
Well, with some help from Alan, Tommy and others asking questions, I've now got V.5 installed and running - but with apparently 20% or so less A/C showing than normal, but could this be due to the lovely weather we're experiencing at the moment.   It has taken several days, and multiple deletions and installs, but slowly getting there.

However, I still have one major problem, although I've gone through the updating Database process, I've still only got 80317 A/C loading in the D/B - any suggestions please.................
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 23, 2013, 07:14:28 AM
Quote from: CoastGuardJon
although I've gone through the updating Database process, I've still only got 80317 A/C loading in the D/B - any suggestions please.................

Firstly, did you use the Database Update option in Database Explorer?  Secondly, did you follow the instructions to restart Radarbox?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 23, 2013, 08:38:30 AM
I might have overlooked it, but I've got one question about the database:

In the database what does the autoupdate (Y) mean? Does it mean, the big online Airnav database can overrule my personal database? Let's say I got flight XYZ1234. Official routing is AAAA-BBBB-CCCC-DDDD, but I want the route displayed as BBBB-CCCC-DDDD. In the online Airnav database the routing is displayed as AAAA-CCCC-DDDD.  When I thick Y in autoupdate, does the online database changes the routing to AAAA-CCCC-DDDD iso the route I want to show it? So when I thick N at autoupdate, the online database won't correct my personal database and leaves it as BBBB-CCCC-DDDD?

Regards,
Michel.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 23, 2013, 08:41:37 AM
Michel, correct.  Set AUTOUPDATE to N to stop your manually changed record from being updated by the system.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 23, 2013, 08:45:52 AM
Thanks Tarbat. In that case I have to change a lot of Y in N ;-)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 23, 2013, 08:47:10 AM
Alternatively Michel, advise me what needs changed and I can update the database.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 23, 2013, 08:53:31 AM
Michel, or turn off Route Auto-populate in preferences.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 23, 2013, 08:55:24 AM
Next week after the start of the winter schedule, you can find me in your database update topic again, Alan. ;-)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 23, 2013, 09:01:55 AM
I know Tarbat, but when I turn it off I won't discover any mistakes or missing flight ID's in the official database. And I wan't to continu my help to get the official database as correctly as possible.

And for some reason when I turn it off, Airnav won't find some flight ID's in my personal database. At this moment SAS556 won't show it's routing EHAM-ESSA, while the correct routing is in my database.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 23, 2013, 09:06:24 AM
I am looking forwards to Sunday Michel, not!!!  Your assistance would be greatly appreciated as always.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 23, 2013, 09:07:59 AM
Give me a few days and I've got most of the EZY, DLH, etc in and out of EHAM for you.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 23, 2013, 09:14:26 AM
Thanks Michel that will be great,  I have the BAW, BEE, BER, NLY, BHP updates getting processed ready for changing in the d/b

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 23, 2013, 06:40:47 PM
Quote from: CoastGuardJon
although I've gone through the updating Database process, I've still only got 80317 A/C loading in the D/B - any suggestions please.................
Firstly, did you use the Database Update option in Database Explorer?  Secondly, did you follow the instructions to restart Radarbox?

Hi Chris,
No I hadn't, never updated that way before, usually just click on the Update D/B address in Orkney's post, so tried that way and now got 207639 A/C, so am now a rather happy chappy.   Many thanks to all who've helped me get this far!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 24, 2013, 01:12:37 PM
Now what have I done, tried to set up auto start but get this,   
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 24, 2013, 03:10:43 PM
anorak, are you sure you've setup the autostart to the correct folder?  And the correct "Start In" folder?  rb.dll should exist in you main Radarbox folder.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: RodBearden on October 24, 2013, 04:46:43 PM
More photo problems; 4CA294 - EI-DEN. I have photos from v4, and also photos from v5 with the random code after the filenames - all thse photos are doubling up, which is a pain.

Further, none of these photos are showing in the grid. The photo links in the database are correct, linking to the proper photos in Airliners. The only thing odd about the plane is that it's using a wrong Flight ID - EHN176.

Any ideas?

EDIT - deleted the record from the database, did a second database update for today, and restarted - now the photos are appearing - odd.

Rod
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 24, 2013, 04:55:43 PM
Rod, I've three tasks open with AirNav relating to photo problems.  These examples all help to reinforce the points I'm making about the changes that are needed.  Thanks.

When you say "the grid", do you mean MyLog?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: RodBearden on October 24, 2013, 04:59:41 PM
No - the interface grid - MyFlights and Network  - I didn't check MyLog, but the photos are showing in MyLog now - see the edit to my prevoius post.

Rod
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 24, 2013, 05:29:52 PM
Rod, do you know what was in the PTTN & PTTN2 fields for the aircraft in Database Explorer?  That's what currently determines the photos that get displayed in MyFlights.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: RodBearden on October 24, 2013, 07:32:37 PM
Tarbat - I didn't make a note, but, because they both worked when I copied and pasted them into my browser, I've got them from my browser history. They are:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Aer-Lingus/Airbus-A320-214/2262166/L
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Aer-Lingus/Airbus-A320-214/2314870/L/

Rod
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 24, 2013, 07:37:33 PM
Those are the LK and LK2 fields - that's not where the thumbnails are retrieved from.  Anyway, don't worry, AirNav have agreed to my changes which should, I hope, fix the various thumbnail photo problems.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 25, 2013, 09:33:36 AM
yesterday evening, before shutting down RB, I did a update on the database, just now I wanted to work on the DB to alter some more PTTN entries to my own pics ....... PTTN and CS fields are blank now
does this mean we are back to the "good old" system for showing pics, or does this mean that everytime after a update, the fields will be blank ?
can't check it out myself now, as I have to go working now

edit ; I already had altered some entries yesterday, but they seems to be gone also, I have settings set to not modifie my own data, so why are they gone ?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 25, 2013, 09:41:28 AM
Did you set the AUTOUPDATE field to "N" for each record you updated?

And note, as already stated, I'm aware of some problems with how photos work, I've submitted request to AirNav to change how this works, it's been approved, so will hopefully be in the next beta.  The intention with the proposed changes is that photos will be displayed according the following rules:
1. If PTTN has a value in it, use that thumbnail file name.  Ditto for PTTN2.
2. Otherwise, use the old style file name - eg, for G-EZYA, file names G-EZYA.jpg & G-EZYA,2.jpg
3. Otherwise, NO PHOTO.  However, if displaying in MyLog screen, search photo folder for any photo file with a name that starts with the aircraft registration.

We're trying to cover all eventualities here, with users having saved their own photos over the years, and some aircraft sharing the same registration, etc................
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 25, 2013, 09:45:06 AM
no, they where still on "Y"
as I have the settings in preferences set to not change manually altered data, I thought that would have be enough
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 25, 2013, 09:46:12 AM
did noted that, and hope we get a Beta update soon
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 25, 2013, 09:49:40 AM
The only way Radarbox knows that you've manually updated a record is if you set the AUTOUPDATE field to "N".
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: vonsmalhausen on October 25, 2013, 09:53:23 AM
just did a quick check again in the DB ( now with the box connected ) ; the PTTN fields are populating again, with the (for me) wrong pictures, but all the changes I made yesterday are gone

will think about that autoupdate field next time
do I hope we soon get a new Beta, where all this is no longer necessary
now I really have to go ;-)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Frank on October 25, 2013, 10:28:38 AM
All islands (Waddeneilanden) in front of the Dutch coast have disappeared on the map (Normal view). Why ?

Regards, Frank
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 25, 2013, 12:26:08 PM
Quote from: Frank
All islands (Waddeneilanden) in front of the Dutch coast have disappeared on the map (Normal view). Why ?
A screenshot might help, as my geography may be wrong.  Do you mean these?

I think these are in an outline file in the outlines folder.  Did you have these previously?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 25, 2013, 12:37:58 PM
Tarbat,

Those are indeed the "Waddeneilanden" Same for "Zeeland", the two island left below EHRD on your screenshot.

Michel.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Michel on October 25, 2013, 12:43:12 PM
Btw, is it just me or does Radarbox has some problems showings flight ID starting with a 0? In version 3.13 you had to skip the 0 from the flight ID in the d/b to show the correct route on the map, but in 5.00.47 the map won't show the correct routing.

Right now I'm picking up CAL066 (EHAM-VTBS-RCTP). In my d/b this one is entered as CAL66, and version 3.13 did show the correct routing on the map. But version 5.00.47 doesn't show the route at all.

I've had the same problem with several ETD flights the last few days as well.

Michel.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: RodBearden on October 25, 2013, 12:53:24 PM
The Dutch islands are in the COAST_HR_Belgium.out outline file done by Bones for SBS many years ago.

Probably best not to publish it on the forum. If anyone needs it, PM me.

Rod


Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 25, 2013, 12:59:23 PM
Hi Michel,

I have noted this as well and have advised Airnav.  There must be a problem with the server routine and not the RB software as it should disregard the leading zero and show the route.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Frank on October 25, 2013, 01:00:02 PM
Hi, I guess Rod Bearden gave the answer to my question (Reply 204).BTW I think it's a great update, you all have done a nice job

Regards, Frank
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 26, 2013, 09:09:05 AM
Michel,

Regarding route with leading zero not showing flight ID, this has been logged as a bug, FS264

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 11:54:27 AM
While trying to spread the software over to monitors, errors were generated repeatingly. It took a restart of the computer to be able to spread the ANRB Window over two monitors again.

Until now I wasn't able to get a realistic hight vision in 3D Mode if Pilots View or top-down view is chosen. I expected this to be solved by a simple ticking/unticking a box named show correct hight in 3D mode and not using some annoying toying with some offsets. The airframes deliver a hight and this hight shall be applied to the virtual camera in 3D mode. It can't be to complicated to programm it if I'm not totally wrong.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 12:09:26 PM
After using the search function with blank result I entereds an airframe reg that is in the db, but the search didn't deliver a search result. After hitting show all and looking up the same reg, the airframe was found.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 26, 2013, 12:35:36 PM
Hi Ingo,

Following receipt of your reply I have tried the search function on the aircraft table and I have looked up 10 aircraft taken at random from the network display and all have been found.  I have not pressed the show all button

Similarly opening up mylog opens at todays flights as it always has done.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 26, 2013, 12:37:50 PM
Ingo, when I tested the fix for 3D altitude the values looked correct to me, so I'm surprised you're still seeing problems.  I've looked back through my testing log, and once the programmer made the changes I observed:
Quote
Chris : 9 Sep 2013 : Tested thoroughly, and this now appears to be working correctly. Checking the object altitudes in Google Earth via. the GE port shows aircraft flying at the correct altitude in 3D space. For example, ICE503 showing as flying at 39025ft in MyFlights, and the object in Google Earth has an altitude of 11895m.
You can see I even went to the trouble of checking the actual values being passes to the GE Plugin.  Can you capture an example of the wrong altitude in 3D and post a screenshot.  I can't test in 3D at the moment.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 01:04:54 PM
Hi Alan,

I did the search again, and now it works. But when I posted the mishap it was reproduceable. Don't know what has caused it. These are the worst mistakes/errors that can happen: Comming and goinig without identifying the original cause.

Hi tarbat:

I enabled pilots view and was reading the alt in myflights list. As the airframe was flying over my house, the vision doesn't look right (much too high) so I noted the alt in ft re-calculated it to metres and went to GE. The area visible in Radarbox seems to be about ten times to high. Will wait until next EDDV arrival an taking some screenshots to proof.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 26, 2013, 01:11:28 PM
Ingo, if you're familiar with Google Earth, you can test this for yourself, by setting up a NETWORK LINK in GE containing:
        http://localhost:7895/AircraftHW.kmz

You can then see the actual altitudes being assigned to each aircraft in GE 3D space.  Maybe what you're observing is a FOV vs ZOOM effect?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 01:44:25 PM
I think this a little more then a FOV versus ZOOM effect...

The area seen by GE plugin (PIC1 GE Plugin RB sw) and in GE itself (PIC3-4 in GE at same hight and aprox. same tilt angle) aren't even close to match up for the hight of 3385ft (1031m).

Maybe there is some kind of difference in handling of data and/or view calculation / display between the GE plug-in used in ANRB and GE itself.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 01:51:08 PM
Addition:

Although I must admit, that it is already much better then in V4.03.

With GE plugin in RB software it's a little bit like looking through a wide angle lens.

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 26, 2013, 01:55:38 PM
Ingo, as I say, I can't test at the moment because I'm waiting for Airnav to re-enable my 3D access (it was turned off to test something else).  As soon as I've got 3D access back, I'll check this.  If you're able to setup the NETWORK LINK in GE I suggested you should be able to verify that the correct aircraft altitudes are being passed to the GE plugin.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 02:05:29 PM
Yes, I was able to check the altitudes in GE. An they are indeed correct (despite the usual rounding errors). And i temporaryly switched back to V4 on the other machine and used pilots view there too. Comparing the two, the view in/under V5 is indeed much better. But somehow the view is different to GE. 

And: Latidude, Longitude are shown correctly, but altitude is shown as  (see picture). I guess this counts as a real problem.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 26, 2013, 02:06:10 PM
Ingo,

3D was changed because a user complained that he didnt like the view we had been using previously and requested that it be changed to show the correct altitude.  http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=5238.0

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: neroon79 on October 26, 2013, 02:20:45 PM
I didn't like the previous view either and from my point of view it's already much better then in V4, but there is still a little missmatch between GE plugin view and GE. If using GE plugin in V5 it still seems, that the "view altitude" is a little to high and the field of view a little to big (like looking through a wide angle lens).

To be clear: It's complaining at a very high level of satisfaction. I'll be able to live with the current view, what wasn't the case with V4. But maybe it's possible to squeeze it a little bit more...

Ingo
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 26, 2013, 02:47:44 PM
When I chatted with the developer whilst we were fixing the previous bug (feet instead of metres) it was apparent that he was working within the limitations of the GE plugin, which has limited options (eg tilt angle restrictions, FOV, etc.).  I think we now have a 3D view that accurately puts the aircraft in 3D space, but has to work within the limitations of the GE plugin.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Frank on October 27, 2013, 10:07:55 AM
Hi Tarbat,

Sorry for the late response. The Dutch islands (Waddeneilanden) and most Zeeuwse Islands are not in the standard outline files supplied bij Airnav. As Rod Bearden (reply204) kindly has mentioned, you have to download  third party software to make them visible. This is not an Airnav 5.0 issue, it has been an issue all the time. These islands (for example the island of Texel with the local airport EHTX is floating around in the Northsea, the island is missing) were never there on the base map over the years. In fact around 15% of The Netherlands was never there on these maps. Odd, and a bit of a bother, or Airnav is way ahead of time... (I know I can make use of OpenStreetMap/Satellite layers, but this is not my issue....)

Frank
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 27, 2013, 10:39:08 AM
Frank, thanks for confirming this isn't a v5 issue.  Yes, the standard mapping is basic, but can be enhanced with downloaded outline files or OSM.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tarbat on October 28, 2013, 11:43:09 AM
Finally got a break from beta testing, so thought I'd have a go at comparing 3D views in ANRB compared to Google Earth.  Look pretty similar to me, albeit with a small time delay between the two screenshots:

(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7298/10534004985_1444cfc193_m_d.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/10534004985/sizes/o/in/photostream/) (http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7452/10534048474_68036aa189_m_d.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/10534048474/sizes/o/in/photostream/)
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: SIGINT1 on October 29, 2013, 07:24:33 PM
Just upgraded my HP Laptop to Windows 8.1 - Then upgraded from 4.3 to 5.044 - Had to use the windows advanced start up option to disable driver signature enforcement to load the 64 bit drivers but they loaded fine - applied the 5.047 patch and it upgraded and it appears to be running fine
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on October 29, 2013, 07:45:33 PM
Hi Alan, Chris and AN,
Having successfully (eventually with help) got V.5.00.44 up and running a few days ago, I agree with previous comments that the sensitivity and numbers of A/C are definitely down by 25 - 35% - although I can't understand why a software change would affect sensitivity, unless it requires significant additional data to function accurately.   Who else is experiencing this problem, or is it because of the inclement weather affecting our RBs?    I'm on Windows 7 - 64 bit.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: thedouth on October 29, 2013, 08:37:03 PM
Thanks about reminding me about using windows advance start up. I have now done the same and i am working on windows 8.1
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 31, 2013, 11:08:26 AM
On starting RB I get RB1 not found, is this just me being a numpty or is there some other issue as loading takes for ever?
Dave.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 31, 2013, 11:40:39 AM
That means that it hasnt found your box.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 31, 2013, 01:40:03 PM
Thats what I thought, but why does it still work?
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 31, 2013, 02:01:55 PM
You sure it wasnt RB2?

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 31, 2013, 02:17:14 PM
thats not found as well, but haven`t got 3D.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on October 31, 2013, 02:42:14 PM
Guess you confused it for a second or two, i wouldnt worry if its working.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: anorak on October 31, 2013, 03:07:13 PM
One of my attributes, that and upsetting old ladies.
Thanks,  Dave
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on November 01, 2013, 06:03:01 PM
Sorry to harp on about this again, has anyone else noticed the significant drop in numbers on the network, or are numbers down due to the weather, or something just as simple as fewer boxes being on and contributing.
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: EK01 on November 02, 2013, 09:39:20 AM
Or a change to the winter schedules !
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: CoastGuardJon on November 02, 2013, 12:04:42 PM
Ah yes, the clocks went back to GMT last weekend, so you've probably hit the nail on the head EK01 - thanks for the suggestion!!
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: tommyg on November 02, 2013, 01:05:05 PM
The westbound NAT traffic has been further north of you this week as well
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: FACTflights on November 05, 2013, 07:02:24 AM
The "My Log" used to change date at midnight automatically.  Now with version 5.00.053, I find that I have to click on the calendars and change the dates manually.  Then click on "Today" to refresh.  Is this a bug ? I am using Windows 7 64 bit. 
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: Runway 31 on November 05, 2013, 10:16:52 AM
John,

I dont know how it did things previously but if you close down mylog and open again up after 00:00 it changes.

I would suggest that it is working as designed as you opened it up for a particular day and it should'nt change day unless you request it to.

Alan
Title: Re: Your experience upgrading to 5.00.044
Post by: FACTflights on November 05, 2013, 02:14:38 PM
Thanks Alan.