Taking in account there is no need for you to day after day report one or two wrong callsigns on our database
Davereid: we've not seen any reply from you yet regarding this (correct me if I'm wrong). Taking in account there is no need for you to day after day report one or two wrong callsigns on our database and that you are offering the Flightroutelookup.com services to an SBS addon would you allow our central server to do the same? (automatically retrieve route data from your server).
Let us know so we can implement this feature for the benefit of the RadarBox community.
That makes no sense. Please explain.
Can we rely on information provided by your site?
Get a grip, it can only improve on what is available at this time. Time will tell on reliability.
In that case we will keep using our own sources which are correct for 99.9% of the cases. Thanks for your help anyway.
We did a search for a few but most of them didn't have any origin/destination information?
FlightID DepICAO ArrICAO
ACA853 EGLL CYYC
ANZ1 EGLL KLAX
BEE3MG
BEE3VD
BMA67G
LOG23DB
RAE559
RYR2ZH
SHT18V
Dave how many flights do you have on your callsign database?
But please note that there is a proper mode-s forum on the internet for negative, sarcastic and false comments and it is not this one.
We know that the total number of routes shown is far from 100% but there is nothing that can be done regarding it. It is impossible to know the origin/destination for all flights without a connection to euroControl (at least in Europe).
It's now official - further substantial progress in decoding routes is impossible - end of and case closed.
99.9% correct means the routes shown.
Maybe in your part of the world. In my part the only problems I have are ones caused by pilot putting in the incorrect code onto their transponder... and of course Durban. So based on my survey the database is 100% correct.
This is the last I'm going to say about this.
That statement is scandalous. A few weeks ago I did a snap survey on routings and out of 20 flights watched coming up over central England, 4 were blatantly wrong. Now, I'm no maths genius but this doesn't equate to 99.9%. I'm sure if everyone did the same they too would shoot down your figures.
May I politely suggest you fire the company who provide you with these ficticious numbers.