AirNav Systems Forum
AirNav RadarBox and RadarBox24.com => AirNav RadarBox and RadarBox24.com Discussion => Topic started by: AirNav Development on June 28, 2009, 11:51:54 AM
-
Part 2 of AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta discussion.
We have created a new topic to continue the discussion on V3.0 Beta.
Only problem reports will be accepted on this new topic.
-
As a reminder, below V3.0 changes/new features and download links.
RadarBox is the only receiver with an integrated worldwide ADS-B network and with a huge set of features inside a single application without the need of installing 3rd party addons. AirNav RadarBox 2009 - V3.00 is by far the most complete, sophisticated, reliable and accurate ADS-B decoding software ever released.
As usual work never stops at AirNav Systems. We are already developing the brand new "AirNav FlightWatch" application to be released later this year. This will be focused on the professional market but with an enthusiast version also available. It is the only software able to track flights using an worldwide data source network: FAA Radar System, ADS-B, RadarBox Unit, ACARS and Flight Plan information.
Full Download:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/download/anrb/ANRB30BetaSetup.exe
Upgrade from V2.0 to V3.0 Beta:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/download/anrb/ANRBUpgrade20to30Beta.exe
Official full list of suggestions/improvements:
- 20% more flight IDs received: decoding of more mode-s protocol frames;
- Tracking of aircraft sending ADS-B information on ground;
- Possibility of writing custom labels on map;
- Optional retrieval of flight information data from online database;
- Flights without callsign information added to MyLog;
- New/Updated AIRAC cycle: more than 100 thousand updated aviation database (airport, runway, VOR, NDB);
- Ability to zoom in closer. Hi-Res airport outlines / track aircraft in taxiways;
- Possibility of auto populating aircraft information without downloading photos;
- Improved Algorithm for the transition of network flights to live (and live to network);
- Corrected problem with Slow Menus on certain machines;
- 1698 Airline Logos (many of them reviewed);
- 404 Country/Military Flags;
- UK/Ireland Time on status bar now shown correctly;
- Choose to show/hide Home position on map;
- Alerts/Reports email reports now sent from central server;
- Improve user awareness of incompatibility with AVG Anti-Virus (easy to add exception);
- More application data being worked inside threads: application runs faster;
- Preferences box now fits different screen resolutions;
- FTP Upload status information on status panel;
- "Purple rain/invalid positions" problem corrected;
- Improved Logo decoding routine: fully compatible with ICAO, IATA, Military and private jet flight codes;
- Option to show/hide Home Legend
- Registration/multiple alerts now working correctly;
- Weather List clearing problem corrected;
- Aviation Signs in Menu status updated;
- Email Alerts at consecutive days problem corrected;
- Duplicates in the Reporter bug corrected;
- Remember of Last Color Used;
- Up/Down arrows to show Vertical Rate on maps;
To all the team involved, especially the dedicated beta-testers a huge thank you!
-
Thanks airnav , however when can we expect update patch 1?
-
We have about 20 problems reported. The 3 major ones are now corrected.
The remaining are easier to correct and we will be working on them during the next 3 days. After that we plan to send the .exe to the user that reported some of those problems - once we get a green light from all of them we will have the new .exe available to the public.
We want to have some good news by July 2nd.
-
Can I suggest that a date for the .EXE be added to the download links above, along with any patch Version detail - patch1 for instance, so users can see if there is a newer version of the Beta.
Thanks.
Updated for reply below:-
I was thinking of the Public Beta and it's build date - NOT all the restricted pool Beta versions!!!
-
Jgrloit: we would do that but since there are external factors that do not depend on us (pre-testing done by users that complained) we can't. We want to send the new .exe to those users this Tuesday - we will keep this thread informed on what's going on.
-
Development
A very minor bug, on the myflights list you have the red outline to show which square your cursor is on. If you have a flight that doesn't autopopulate for example if you are not connected to internet. On the blank line in the myflights list the red cursor outline disappears on the empty silhouette column. It appears in all other columns and on silhouettes of populated aircraft.
-
Hi I originally reported that V3 works faster for, which it does, but after the program has been running for a short time the menus stop working.
-
What time scale are you looking at?
-
I do not know if this is possible but when you click a spot and drag the courser and instead of moving the map it shows the bearing and a line from where you clicked to the current mouse position (like a real radar at ATC would)?
-
why is it when i uninstall v2 and download and install beta v3 it does not run.
It is running in processes but the software is not running?
-
Are you using Windows XP
-
windows vista
-
Strange, there is a bug with Xp, but I thought vista was ok
-
why is it when i uninstall v2 and download and install beta v3 it does not run.
It is running in processes but the software is not running?
How long have to left the software loading before giving up? The new install seems to take a while to check all the files on first run.
Also, there was no need to unistall your previous version of RB, as V3.0 Beta installs into a totally separate directory - although with Vista, I'm not too sure what it does!
Glad I skipped the whole Vista thing!
-
I had a play with vista, but I am now using xp again. totaly agree with you Allocator. Sent you a pm mate
Andy
-
Don't know whether it's already reported or not. But I noticed, that the "StartPosition" and "EndPosition" information in the "Flights for selected Aircraft" section of MyLog is "useless" since I changed to the v3.0 Beta version.
The following error occurs: Only the Latitude position seems to be correct. The Longitude position is filled with the Data of the latitude position.
I hope the Bug with the "growing" aircraft trail without an AC symbol (Plane or square) on the top of it is also a known problem. ;-)
A Buglist at the beginning of this threat might be a good idea, because it may prevent the double-posting of already know problems.
-
Don't know whether it's already reported or not. But I noticed, that the "StartPosition" and "EndPosition" information in the "Flights for selected Aircraft" section of MyLog is "useless" since I changed to the v3.0 Beta version.
For Airnav. This bug seems to have been introduced sometime between 14th and 17th June - so maybe at the end of the closed beta period.
-
Vista will install were ever you want it to as long as you don't let it do it itself. When you are asked during install select for example d:\airnav_2009_beta.
This works absolutely fine here
-
I hope the Bug with the "growing" aircraft trail without an AC symbol (Plane or square) on the top of it is also a known problem. ;-)
A Buglist at the beginning of this threat might be a good idea, because it may prevent the double-posting of already know problems.
In the Beta exe I tested last week that problem is now fixed and should be available soon.
-
Thanks neroon79.
We have noted them.
-
Menu freezes - during closed Beta I discovered with the team that using a remote desktop software to access your ANRB will cause the menu freeze problems. The development team are aware of this and hopefully sorting out.
I can repeat this error using LogMeIn and VNC remote access software but i have not tried Teamviewer which I know a lot of you use.
Keith
-
While playing with the map color, I got these nice screen shots:
(http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z157/neroon79/Airnav%20RADAR%20Box/th_AirNavRadarBox2009-30BetaShotat2009.gif) (http://s192.photobucket.com/albums/z157/neroon79/Airnav%20RADAR%20Box/?action=view¤t=AirNavRadarBox2009-30BetaShotat2009.gif)
(http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z157/neroon79/Airnav%20RADAR%20Box/th_AirNavRadarBox2009-30BetaShotat2-1.gif) (http://s192.photobucket.com/albums/z157/neroon79/Airnav%20RADAR%20Box/?action=view¤t=AirNavRadarBox2009-30BetaShotat2-1.gif)
Well, from my point of view, the Sea topography of the whole northern hemisphere seems to be scrambled like an unfinished puzzle. Southern hemisphere seems to be correct.
-
Hi. Will the patch 1 make this work with VISTA 64 bit?? Please let me know AIRNAV. Thanks
-
Many thanks for this info, it has been driving me crazy. I use logMeIn, so that might be the reason.
Again many thanks for the information.
Stu
Menu freezes - during closed Beta I discovered with the team that using a remote desktop software to access your ANRB will cause the menu freeze problems. The development team are aware of this and hopefully sorting out.
I can repeat this error using LogMeIn and VNC remote access software but i have not tried Teamviewer which I know a lot of you use.
Keith
-
swadeep,
The software runs fine with Vista64bit. If you mean the drivers are not being allowed to be installed on it then there are ways round this.
We are working with Microsoft to get the drivers certified.
-
HI I have used Teamviewer since V3 upgrade and I can't recall any problems. Was it a particular part of the menu that froze as I'm happy to check it out on teamviwer for future reference.
John
-
The pull downs freeze in both the remote acces screen and on the live PC.
I associated it with the application being minimised as well. Worth a try maybe using TeamViewer fixes the problem. Would be nice to know.
-
HI I have used Teamviewer since V3 upgrade and I can't recall any problems. Was it a particular part of the menu that froze as I'm happy to check it out on teamviwer for future reference.
John
Hi John
Its the file,filters,tools,maps,help, etc, they just freeze, and the only way to get them to work is restart Airnav, then after a short while they stop working.
-
Hi all
I have downloaded the beta (3) version but when i click on the (new) desktop icon to run the program the Microsoft warning kicks in saying that RB has detected problems and needs to close, with the usual option for sending the report. When i downloaded the upgrade to version 3 and then try and run it a window pops up and says that the RB.DLL is missing and cannot start but to try re-installing the software may help. I am using Xp service pack 3 and the version 2 runs fine and always has done. Any suggestions?????
Thanks BILLY
-
Does V2.1 still run, or did you uninstall it?
-
Version 2.00 still runs fine, i didnt know there was a version 2.1, but as stated version 2.0 runs fine, di need to uninstall version 2.0 im afraid if un-install version 2.0 and then cant get version 3.0 to run
Thanks Billy
-
hi all
i have a Mode S Flight Route Regist Airc Airline Date and Time
43C219 AAC555 ZA766 ... UK - Army 2009/06/30 19:43:06
my picture show a army helicopter, but when i click on photo it shows a Picture of the Cessna 421B Golden Eagle aircraft-----------------airliner.net not right.
from pat
-
OK Billy - I think that V2.1 and 2.0 were the same, but one came on CD with a new RB and the other was downloaded - can't remember now :-)
I'm not too sure what your problem might be.
-
Yeah i downloaded my current version a while ago I have been using RB for just over a year now, i find it brilliant. Maybe some else comes across the same problem as more people download the newer version and maybe a fix can be found, but in the meantime i can still enjoy the current version.
Thanks for you help and replies anyway.
Regards BILLY
-
I noticed a further strange thing:
Under preferences I unchecked the "Auto-Populate Aircraft Data" feature, but kept the "download photo" feature aktive. After that, I manually changed the false entry of the SIA 9V-SKH A380 in the "NavData" Database. Then I have manually corrected the MyLog entry of the mentioned aircraft. Finally I removed the downloaded 9V-SKH pictures of the "stored" B744 AC from the photo directory.
And now it comes: Today, after tracking the 9V-SKH in flight, the MyLog entry was changed back to the false B744 data, while the NavData DB entry is still correct. Is it possible, that the "Photo download" feature is somehow messing with the MyLog entries?
Is this a known problem?
Let's see what happens if I don't delete the pictures of the earlier B744 9V-SKH.
-
billmurphy,
Right click on the RadarBox Beta version icon and select proprties then compabilty mode and select run as windows 98/Me.
-
MyLog is a historic record of what you have picked up using your antenna. If you have changed the details of 9V-SKH using DataBase Explorer, this will not affect waht you see in MyLog for past contacts, but it should correct it for new contacts.
As far as I'm aware, all my A380's have autopopulated correctly without any manual edits.
-
I noticed a further strange thing:
Under preferences I unchecked the "Auto-Populate Aircraft Data" feature, but kept the "download photo" feature aktive. After that, I manually changed the false entry of the SIA 9V-SKH A380 in the "NavData" Database. Then I have manually corrected the MyLog entry of the mentioned aircraft. Finally I removed the downloaded 9V-SKH pictures of the "stored" B744 AC from the photo directory.
And now it comes: Today, after tracking the 9V-SKH in flight, the MyLog entry was changed back to the false B744 data, while the NavData DB entry is still correct. Is it possible, that the "Photo download" feature is somehow messing with the MyLog entries?
Is this a known problem?
Let's see what happens if I don't delete the pictures of the earlier B744 9V-SKH.
OK, I'm with you now :-)
I checked 9V-SKH using Database Explorer and it showed the incorrect details for the B747, so this is what I did:
- Manual update using DataBase Exploer putting in the correct details for 9V-SKH
- Deleted the photo link details in DataBase Explorer too in case these were wrong too.
- Opened MyLog and searched for 9V-SKH - wrong details displayed.
- Deleted the wrong details in MyLog by clicking on the fields and selecting delete
- Used MyLog Populate and the correct details are now entered automatically into the blank record fields for 9V-SKH.
-
Allocator,
The 9V-SKH is missing in your list. Try out to find the 9V-SKH in your MyLog. your At first the 9V-SKH was tracked as B744 of an unknown Airline. I manually changed it at all positions. Especially in the MyLog Database.
Screenshot of my tracked A380 AC:
(http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z157/neroon79/Airnav%20RADAR%20Box/MyLogA380Screenshot.jpg)
But after downloading the two AC images it changed back to the B744 Data.
-
Airnav support
Run version 3 in compatability mode (98/me) and its working fine.
Thanks for your support WELL DONE
Regards BILLY
-
billmurphy
I think there is a fix being sorted for this problem, should be fixed in the next beta edition, so you won't have to wait to long.
Andy
-
I checked 9V-SKH using Database Explorer and it showed the incorrect details for the B747, so this is what I did:
- Manual update using DataBase Exploer putting in the correct details for 9V-SKH
- Deleted the photo link details in DataBase Explorer too in case these were wrong too.
- Opened MyLog and searched for 9V-SKH - wrong details displayed.
- Deleted the wrong details in MyLog by clicking on the fields and selecting delete
- Used MyLog Populate and the correct details are now entered automatically into the blank record fields for 9V-SKH.
Well, we did the same. But after tracking the 9V-SKH again (with activated photo download feature) , the false B744 data is back again. But only in MyLog. This time I leave the false 9V-SKH pictures where they are and see what happens now...
Hopefully the SKH is servicing the late SIA flight from LHR to SIN later this evening (night).
I find out about the 9V-SKH problem by using this site: http://plane.spottingworld.com/A380_production_list
According to this list the SKH was delivered before the SKG. Futher i was wayting for SIA318 but somehow it didn't occur. I got suspicious and did some
recherche. The rest is history.
-
Allocator,
The 9V-SKH is missing in your list. Try out to find the 9V-SKH in your MyLog. your At first the 9V-SKH was tracked as B744 of an unknown Airline. I manually changed it at all positions. Especially in the MyLog Database.
But after downloading the two AC images it changed back to the B744 Data.
Changing the details for 9V-SKH in MyLog will NOT change the details when you pick the aircraft up again in the wrong details are still in NavData.db3 which is edited using File > DataBase Explorer. Look again at my 2 posts and the 2 MyLog screen shots. Read carefully how I fixed this.
Edit: OK read you posts thanks.
You will also need to delete the 2 incorrect 9V-SKH photos in the /Photos directory, as they won't be overwritten by autopoulate and you will be stuck with the old pictures. These are:
9V-SKH.jpg
9V-SKH,2.jpg
-
neroon79/Allocater
Just looked in my Navdata file and mylog file - I am showing the correct details for 9V-SKH in both of them, the only thing which is wrong is the photo link, this to the B744.
Andy
-
Andy, yes, thats where I am now, except that I've now deleted the 2 incorrect thumbnails so hopefully I will get a correct photo autopopulate next time I get 9v-SKH.
I wonder if this is reuse of the registration, or did GAS AND airliners.net have the wrong details, as the data will have come from both?
-
Ah-ha! Found it!
N122KH (cn 23033/609) The original SQ c/s seen on a dull & cold Winters day at Kastrup. Note the SAS DC-10 and B747 parked behind. Registrations used by this airframe: N122KH, 9V-SKH, TJ-CAE, HS-VAB [Canon AE-1]
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?aircraft_genericsearch=&airlinesearch=&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=n122kh&range=&sort_order=datestamp+desc&page_limit=15&thumbnails=
-
Allocator
Looks like the reg of 9V-SKH has been used before on the B744. What I have done is downloaded the photo's I want from Airliners, Then make the link from my hard drive, after resizing of cause.
Andy
-
If you search For 9V-SKH on Airliners, look at second page, its shown as the B744
Andy
-
OK Andy, yes I see that now, I didn't look far enough down the page.
-
Changing the details for 9V-SKH in MyLog will NOT change the details when you pick the aircraft up again in the wrong details are still in NavData.db3 which is edited using File > DataBase Explorer. Look again at my 2 posts and the 2 MyLog screen shots. Read carefully how I fixed this.
I did, and figured out that I have done it completely the same way you did.
EDIT:
The B744 (earlier 9V-SKH) is , what we in Germany call "Eingemottet".
Look here: http://www.planesregister.com/aircraft/b747-23033.htm
-
Thnks Sir!
However, i would have liked :
1) a VCR style, to review my recorder traffic
2) the airways name
3) the real weather impressed on the map
I hope on the next version .. ;-)
Take care
Patrizio
-
Just to keep our users updated. Development on V3.0 Beta patch continues. Unfortunately it will be impossible to release it before July 5th as we need to wait for several users feedback on some corrected items. Some good news to follow.
-
Will it be possible to overlay the weather on the map, that would be a very nice feature!
-
Don't tell anyone you read this...but that is being programmed now for the AirNav FlightWatch application and will be applied to RadarBox after that. All the world cloud coverage and weather included.
-
Explain This One Please
405CB5 (Peter Clayton Knight) G-PHYZ Jabiru J430
LK = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-Europa/Boeing-737-683/0773743/M//L/
LK2 = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Jabiru-J430/1458940/L/&sid=87420e24a3b39cbe1dc32f
I found this when updating my Navdata File.
There is also items still being changed within the Navdata File, I now this as I mostly put XXX in Fields PT/LK/PT2/LK2 these are being changed by "Untitled" or "---". This has been discussed before. Have a look at the attachement.
Andy
-
Another One
A6813F (Liberty Aerospace Inc) N518XL Liberty XL-2
LK = http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA---Navy/Sikorsky-SH-60B-Seahawk/1207555/M//L/
LK2 = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Liberty-XL-2/1212459/L/&sid=542b74681b404cc87fb5d
-
How many More
3CCAB6 (EBM-Papst Mulfingen GmbH & CoKG) D-CEBM Cessna 560 Citation Encore
Lk = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Deutsche-BA/Boeing-737-31S/0260413/M//L/
LK2 = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Cessna-560-Citation/1089888/L/&sid=7599382bae67fd
Can someone check these to it is me or a use wide problem.
-
Another One
A6813F (Liberty Aerospace Inc) N518XL Liberty XL-2
LK = http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA---Navy/Sikorsky-SH-60B-Seahawk/1207555/M//L/
LK2 = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Liberty-XL-2/1212459/L/&sid=542b74681b404cc87fb5d
I only have LK for this -looks OK. I have 2 thumbnails that are correct.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1059511&size=L
I almost never click on the thumbnails to see the bigger picture, so I don't have a great deal to offer here I'm afraid.
-
How many More
3CCAB6 (EBM-Papst Mulfingen GmbH & CoKG) D-CEBM Cessna 560 Citation Encore
Lk = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Deutsche-BA/Boeing-737-31S/0260413/M//L/
LK2 = http://www.airliners.net/photo/Cessna-560-Citation/1089888/L/&sid=7599382bae67fd
Can someone check these to it is me or a use wide problem.
Same with this, just LK
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1089888&size=L
-
Like you Allocator
I never click on the thumbnails just found them and lots more while updating.
Take a look at the attachment and compare LK colum with LK2.
Andy
-
Allocator
Would there be any chance I have a corrupt File.
Andy
-
Would there be any chance I have a corrupt File.
No - same results here.
It's similar to the issue with military aircraft coming up with completely unrelated photos, although in that case it's even worse as even the thumbnails aren't always correct.
See www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2507.msg27267#msg27267
The good news is that AirNav are committed to resolving the issue and, I'm given to understand, are currently looking at spending money on an external resource to straighten out the photo/type details issue once and for all.
I don't know what the timescale is for this.
-
Thanks Dave
Would be nice to see the database sorted too, stop some how the changes being made in the Navdata file and all the Untitled/---
Cheers Mate
Andy
-
Is any work going on to fix dual monitor operations ? This was a problem with 2.0.
Window positions are wrong, restoration of windows is problematic.
Help About centres on the other monitor when it shows up.
Having a dual display is convenient - you can stretch the app to have most columns listed on the left monitor as well as have the map up on the right hand monitor.
-
Can you explain this one in detail? Maybe you could send a screen shot with an example of what you want to achieve.
-
Another issue outstanding -Local Time is out by an hour - I suspect this is daylight saving time related. I'm on Eastern Daylight Time, it shows time to be an hour early.
-
On the dual monitor setup, I have an ATI video card which supports 2 monitors, both set to 1600x1200 resolution, with the desktop extended across them both, effectively 3200x1200.
I want to display the data screen on the left hand and the radar map on the right.
I hit the Restore Down icon, and then drag the bottom right corner of the window to the bottom right of the right ahnd monitor. Then with a bit of tweaking, I get the data colum listing Changed, Tracked, Sttatus, Mode S etc. to show on the left monitor, and the map on the right.
If I exit the program and launch it again, it does not restore the window to these positions.
If I hit Help About (with the mouse in the left monitor at the menu bar), the about window shows up on the right monitor, instead of the left, or centered as one would expect.
Also, I'd be able to open a separate map window on the right monitor.
-
Here's a screen shot of dual monitor.
-
One small thing - at the bottom left, the C in UTC is chopped where it says the Live Data at hh:mm:ss UTC.
-
Is any work going on to fix dual monitor operations ? This was a problem with 2.0.
Window positions are wrong, restoration of windows is problematic.
Help About centres on the other monitor when it shows up.
Having a dual display is convenient - you can stretch the app to have most columns listed on the left monitor as well as have the map up on the right hand monitor.
Don't hold your breath Colin...myself and others have been requesting this for a year now.
I had expected it to be in this latest version :-(
http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=1099.msg8572#msg8572
http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=1139.msg8659#msg8659
Regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
This one is very difficult to develop but after we finish all the pending corrections we will have one programmer dedicated only to this task.
-
When is the non Beta rollout of the new system planned?? (not a big fan of Beta versions)
-
When is the non Beta rollout of the new system planned?? (not a big fan of Beta versions)
When it is ready I guess :-)
-
Please don't ask questions like this as it puts Dev under pressure and they give knee-jerk responses of dates they cannot possibly achieve...is it 25th June or 2nd July yet? ;^)
<ducking>
The standard response to a question such as this would be;
It will be released on Monday...
Regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
or should that be sumday?
-
or should that be sumday?
:-)
-
I have simple needs,I only want to see aircraft on the screen that i can actualy see from my garden.I only have airnav running (on a laptop in the garden) when i am in the garden.I have used airnav since feb 09 and it has been supurb,V3 promised some excellent advantages (flybe flight numbers etc).I have lost confidence in V3 because a lot of aircraft i can see in the overhead (Easy,ryanair ect ) are appearing on the list but with no position detail.Sometimes a trail will migrate across the screen with no aircaft attatched ! The extra sensitivity although true is off little interest to me and i now put the aerial on the floor to restrict "mylog" to 15 or so.Do i wait for a fix to V3 to make these aircraft reappear or reload V2 ?
Nick
-
Do i wait for a fix to V3 to make these aircraft reappear or reload V2 ?
You can re-load v2.
Or just move the map slightly in v3 to make the aircraft re-appear. In fact what I do is click on the Home button if I'm at home, or the Airport Locate button if I'm at an airport, and that makes them re-appear.
It's a beta, so expect some problems.
-
Hi Nick,
Please remeber this is a Beta version which is being done to gain issues so that the full build will be a near perfect as possible.
Yes you can used version 2 again. There is an update to the new beta which should be out soon.
-
Not actually a bug, but something I have asked for a couple of times in the past.
Please could we have smaller increments when zooming in and out on a map. Or better still, have user selectable increments. For precise use, I find the default increments too course and need to be finer.
Many thanks
Jim
-
You can use the right mouse button to draw a box the exact size that you want, if that helps.
-
Something I'm seeing more frequently lately, is aircraft displaying on the map with an altitude, but no altitude in the MyFlights list. Particularly annoying when you sort the MyFlights list by altitude as I do.
A bug to be fixed in v3 please?
Example attached, B752 showing on the map at FL380, but no altitude in the MyFlights list.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2513/3687289848_e9b5b293f4_o.gif)
-
Noted. Tarbat pls report all errors inside this thread so we can keep V3.0 Beta / Patch 1 work organized.
-
It seems to be happening regularly that when RB is running maximised, but with another window in front of it, RB will suddenly jump to the front and get in the way. Could this be in some way related to alerts? I haven't tied this down yet.
Anyone else noticed this?
Rod
-
try to disable alerts and confirm if it still happens.
-
Roger that.
Rod
-
Have to report that it's done it again with all alerts turned off. Am I the only one? Maybe it's just my system.
Rod
-
Rod
No not just you the same here also.
-
Same on here, even when just it's running the tab on the taskbar will flash for no reason as if something had updated or changed.
no alerts on just the autopopulate.
-
that's what I thought and thought I was just seeing things until Rod mentioned it.
-
When is the non Beta rollout of the new system planned?? (not a big fan of Beta versions)
When it is ready I guess :-)
Please! The last thing we need, especially Airnav's programmers, is an unfinished version that soaks up effort from us reporting bugs and them fixing bugs because it's gone out the door too soon.
-
I think by now most people have come to the conclusion that it is no good shouting at the team, they will release when they are good and ready
-
can't find this one in the list so...
map locks up (no aircraft moving) close the map, re-open the map, all you get is the aircraft and info, no background info, i.e coastlines, VOR's airports etc.
close the map several times still the same.
Move the map to somewhere completely different (I use Dubai) everything is then OK. Press Home and we are back to normal?
-
i also notice that when you put the map to full screen and then back to its normal size you get the aircraft as normal but the background is pure blue, no map.
-
Seems to be a similiar problem with map refresh?
-
i also notice that when you put the map to full screen and then back to its normal size you get the aircraft as normal but the background is pure blue, no map.
I've just had the oportunity to test a patch for this and I think its its safe to say it won't be an issue in the future release :-)
John
-
Hi all, after installing the new beta3 version windows is telling me the program can not open because there is a problem, I am using winxp pack3 amd processor
-
when I install the same beta3 version on my other pc the same winxp but with a pentium, there is no problem
-
Hi all, after installing the new beta3 version windows is telling me the program can not open because there is a problem, I am using winxp pack3 amd processor
This is a known problem with V3 beta.
Will be fixed when V3 is released.
-
ok that is good to hear thnks, keep up the good work
-
Have to report that it's done it again with all alerts turned off. Am I the only one? Maybe it's just my system.
Rod
It's not just your system Rod,
RB seems to do funny things with windows in general here too.
Kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
Noticed it does not seem to be as often with Vista, but on my XP machine it is as reported.?
-
Please don't ask questions like this as it puts Dev under pressure and they give knee-jerk responses of dates they cannot possibly achieve...is it 25th June or 2nd July yet? ;^)
<ducking>
The standard response to a question such as this would be;
It will be released on Monday...
Regards,
-=Glyn=-
Paid my money - so I thought I was intitled to ask whatever I wanted....
I wasnt demanding it be a certain date, I just (politely - I thought) asked a question in the 'forum'.
Whatever.... anyway as I say beta testing isnt for me, so I shall await the full release which I now know better than to ask when it might be.
Thank you all for your kindness
-
Please don't ask questions like this as it puts Dev under pressure and they give knee-jerk responses of dates they cannot possibly achieve...is it 25th June or 2nd July yet? ;^)
<ducking>
The standard response to a question such as this would be;
It will be released on Monday...
Regards,
-=Glyn=-
Paid my money - so I thought I was intitled to ask whatever I wanted....
I wasnt demanding it be a certain date, I just (politely - I thought) asked a question in the 'forum'.
Whatever.... anyway as I say beta testing isnt for me, so I shall await the full release which I now know better than to ask when it might be.
Thank you all for your kindness
Geez...lighten up a bit mate. Having a bad day or something?
Do they not have a sense of humour where you come from or did you not see the winking smiley in there?
Or my tongue-in-cheek 'dig' towards AirNav at the dates come & gone, the word ducking in brackets and the light-hearted 'Monday' phrase often quoted when it comes to release dates?
Sorry if you took it the wrong way...no need to get all pear-shaped now....;^)
Kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
Can anyone throw any light on this -
In my smartview I Have EZY175A - G-JEDI.
1) I don't have Easyjet set up in my smartview and 2) G-JEDI is a Flybe aircarft.
EDIT: and it is showing a route EGSH - EGCC, Easyjet do not fly out of Norwich, But Flybe do.
EDIT: On flight tracker it is say should be BE447. It cannot be pilot error.
Andy
-
Thanks Andy, we will take a look sounds unsual.
-
Please don't ask questions like this as it puts Dev under pressure and they give knee-jerk responses of dates they cannot possibly achieve...is it 25th June or 2nd July yet? ;^)
<ducking>
The standard response to a question such as this would be;
It will be released on Monday...
Regards,
-=Glyn=-
Paid my money - so I thought I was intitled to ask whatever I wanted....
I wasnt demanding it be a certain date, I just (politely - I thought) asked a question in the 'forum'.
Whatever.... anyway as I say beta testing isnt for me, so I shall await the full release which I now know better than to ask when it might be.
Thank you all for your kindness
Geez...lighten up a bit mate. Having a bad day or something?
Do they not have a sense of humour where you come from or did you not see the winking smiley in there?
Or my tongue-in-cheek 'dig' towards AirNav at the dates come & gone, the word ducking in brackets and the light-hearted 'Monday' phrase often quoted when it comes to release dates?
Sorry if you took it the wrong way...no need to get all pear-shaped now....;^)
Kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
Nothing at all wrong with my sense of humour, as anybody who knows me will testify.
However, look at it from my point of view.... I asked, when the full version was likely to be released? (Nothing more and nothing less)
In reply I got shot down from all sides by people telling me to stop hassling AirNav as I was making their task harder (err - I wasnt). To stop making unrealistic demands (again I wasnt), and my personal favourite - Dont shout demands at the team (wtf?).
I was directing my query at AirNav - nobody else. They havent seen fit to reply. Fine, simply the fact that there is going to be a version 3 is good news, and I will happily wait a week, a year or a decade for it to arrive.
However, I dont think simply asking a straight forward question about the time scale was quite the crime some saw it as. However I seem to be in a group of one with that assumption - so I will walk away with my tail between my legs, and learn my lesson for the future (consider any question asked on here, very carefully to make sure it could not some how - however slightly - to be seen as an attack against Air Nav... so as to avoid the wrath of the masses)
I do have a life away from aircraft, a very healthy one. Therefore I am not really all that bothered about this whole issue, or indeed when or if I will ever update to V3 of the software (it already does all I need it to, and more, with V2). However, as you may have guessed, it does upset me when people lay into me for no real reason.
Pear Shaped of Heathrow
-
ANRB.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
I keep getting thi scan anyone help
-
I do have a life away from aircraft, a very healthy one. Therefore I am not really all that bothered about this whole issue, or indeed when or if I will ever update to V3 of the software (it already does all I need it to, and more, with V2). However, as you may have guessed, it does upset me when people lay into me for no real reason.
Pear Shaped of Heathrow
I don't really think that anybody was having a go at you, but I think that some of the guys here were remembering the 'punch up' that was almost caused the other week when a couple of guys tried to get AirNav to name a date for the V2.1 beta release (as it was), then gave them grief for it not appearing on that date, then getting even more upset when it was named V3.0.
Keep smiling, we're all coming from the same direction here and I'm sure that there was no intent to give you a hard time.
Hopefully, we won't have to wait a decade :-)
-
Today is a new day!!! Smile guys we getting there slowly!
-
ANRB.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
I keep getting thi scan anyone help
yes - I get this as well v2 works fine but v3 beta crashes
(http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/1917/20090707175339.jpg)
-
Hi HMB851X/pjm,
Airnav are aware of this. Try changing the compatability to Window 98/ME and it should run OK.
Cheers,
Peter
-
Airnav are aware of this. Try changing the compatability to Window 98/ME and it should run OK.
thanks Cumulus - that fixed the problem.
-
thanks Cumulus - that fixed the problem.
Well it's a "get you home fix" but don't forget to change the compatability back to normal when the real fix is released.
-
9M-ISJ,
We understand your point of view but its best for us when we are in beta test mode that we shouldn't place a specfic date for a full release as we want to get all the bugs caught (not possible in closed beta testing) and also take on suggestions.
If it takes longer that way we see it as the better as less likely any bugs will get through.
-
9M-ISJ,
We understand your point of view but its best for us when we are in beta test mode that we shouldn't place a specfic date for a full release as we want to get all the bugs caught (not possible in closed beta testing) and also take on suggestions.
If it takes longer that way we see it as the better as less likely any bugs will get through.
Maybe you shouldn't even quote dates for releasing Beta versions as most of the time they cannot be met...not a criticism you understand! :-)
Kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
Another variation on a theme here...not sure if its been reported in v3 Beta but it is present in v2.10 Beta;
Alerts: We know the Alerts warning is a bit crook and has been acknowledged but something that is probably related is every time I start the app the 'Execute a file' checkbox is ticked. I can untick it but then after I close and restart the app it defaults to checked.
One for the hit list maybe?
Kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
AirNav Support
Can anyone throw any light on this -
In my smartview I Have EZY175A - G-JEDI.
1) I don't have Easyjet set up in my smartview and 2) G-JEDI is a Flybe aircarft.
EDIT: and it is showing a route EGSH - EGCC, Easyjet do not fly out of Norwich, But Flybe do.
EDIT: On flight tracker it is say should be BE447. It cannot be pilot error.
Andy
Another strange thing In my smartview at the moment
404D0D - EZY25LM - G-EZDT - A319 - EGJJ- EGKK
I have nothing in my smartview which is anywhere near EZY.
I Have in my Smartview
VIR*
43C*
QID*
RCH*
AE0*
AE1*
BEE*
TALON*
SHADO*
Andy
-
Interesting, I use SmartView extensively, and I haven't seen anything there that shouldn't be there. This is my SmartView list:
MANUAL
9V-SK*
A6-ED*
VH-OQ*
G-BNL*
G-BYG*
G-CIV*
G-VII*
G-YMM*
G-ZZZ*
G-RAES
-
Allocator
Did you see the strange one I was getting last night, The Flybe one.
Andy
-
I have no explanation for this, as I said, I've only ever seen what I've got setup in the FleetWatch list, so I've got no idea what is going on here.
-
swadeep,
The software runs fine with Vista64bit. If you mean the drivers are not being allowed to be installed on it then there are ways round this.
We are working with Microsoft to get the drivers certified.
Hi. I have installed the version 3 but when i run it it just crashes. I will try set the compability to windows me etc. Anyway are there drivers available yet for vista 64bit. sorry but i am confused? I assume i cant use the drivers from the cd right??
-
Andy
I do not think 43C* or the 2 HEX codes for the USA will work in smartview. It asks for ID or reg. Here are mine.
159*
16*
245*
57-*
58-*
59-*
60-*
61-*
62-*
63-*
64-*
65-*
66-*
67-*
68-*
69-*
70-*
71-*
72-*
73-*
74-*
75-*
76-*
77-*
78-*
79-*
80-*
81-*
82-*
83-*
84-*
85-*
86-*
87-*
88-*
89-*
90-*
91-*
92-*
93-*
94-*
95-*
96-*
97-*
98-*
99-*
00-*
01-*
02-*
03-*
04-*
05-*
06-*
ACA855
AAC*
AB910
ATS*
BLAZ*
CBY*
COT*
CWL*
CMT*
DUKE*
EDGE*
ESS*
FAF*
G-BYUO
G-BYWS
G-CG*
G-CEFG
G-CEOD
G-CMBS
G-GEBJ
G-ESEX
G-EEBJ
G-FPL*
G-FRA*
G-FFR*
G-KRNW
G-LUXE
G-MAFI
G-MPS*
G-OEMT
G-XXEA
G-RAF*
G-SAR*
G-SSXX
G-SUR
G-VLCN
GOTO*
ISF*
KIN*
KRF*
LCS*
LEE*
LOP*
LOS*
LPD*
LX-N9*
LX-N2*
LX-N1*
MK356
MRH*
MAR*
NATO*
NASA*
NOR*
NVY*
N128AB
N308AB
N468AB
N226G
N926NA
N928NA
PA474
PM631
PS915
PZ865
QID*
RCH*
Roxan*
RFR*
RRR*
RRF*
SAK*
SAM*
SHF*
SMG*
SNO*
SRG*
S2607WAD*
WIT*
XF995
XH558
XR*
XS*
XV*
XW*
XX*
XZ*
ZA1*
ZA2*
ZA3*
ZA7*
ZA9*
ZB*
ZD*
ZE*
ZF*
ZG*
ZH1*
ZH2*
ZH5*
ZH6*
ZH7*
ZH8*
ZJ*
ZK0*
ZK4*
ZR*
ZZ*
Dudley
-
many thanks ...thats saved me no end of effort trying to work out what I should have put in smart view
-
In order to upgrade to V3 i need to first install the upgrade from V2 to 3 and then the V3 or i can install the V3 straight away?
-
Jordan you can install V3 straight away, remember it is in Beta at the moment.
-
Ok so ive installed the beta, but when i try to open it it says the "Encounted a problem..." error.
-
If you are running it in Win XP pro, right click on the shorcut and in properties change to run as win98
-
Further to reporting that 'Last 10 miutes'and'last hour' filter doesn't work in version 3 beta. It does actually show but in UTC time not current as selected in preferences page. So this is still a fault to be addressed. Anyone else noticed this.
Mike P
-
AirNav Support
Can anyone throw any light on this -
In my smartview I Have EZY175A - G-JEDI.
1) I don't have Easyjet set up in my smartview and 2) G-JEDI is a Flybe aircarft.
EDIT: and it is showing a route EGSH - EGCC, Easyjet do not fly out of Norwich, But Flybe do.
EDIT: On flight tracker it is say should be BE447. It cannot be pilot error.
Andy
Another strange thing In my smartview at the moment
404D0D - EZY25LM - G-EZDT - A319 - EGJJ- EGKK
I have nothing in my smartview which is anywhere near EZY.
I Have in my Smartview
VIR*
43C*
QID*
RCH*
AE0*
AE1*
BEE*
TALON*
SHADO*
Andy
the last one must be ed straker, does anyone remember?
frank
-
I have Radar Box set up on 3 computers , Upgraded with no problems to 3.0 Beta on both my Vista and XP desktop computers.
I also have a netbook , I tried the upgrade and the complete install but i just kept getting that microsoft error message all the time , and to my dissapointment the older version wouldnt work either.
Fortunately i was able top do a system restore and get my netbook back to its former glory complete with RB 2009 working again.
I am going on holiday soon and want to take my netbook away with me for the first
time , I would like to upgrade or install but affraid if i try it wont work again.
I would rather have the older version that works than 3.0 beta that i cant get to install.
Would i be right in thinking if i download and right click on Airnav logo ,properties ,windows me ,it would then work ,any help appreciated.
Ian
-
t if i download and right click on Airnav logo ,properties ,windows me ,it would then work ,any help appreciated.
Ian
No guarantee, but using that method worked for me.
-
Running RB V3 Beta on XP pro using Compatability mode set to 98/ME should work, there is a fix in the pipeline for this though.
-
We are now sending to the beta testing team what we want to be the last version prior to public release of V3.0 Beta Patch 1. If it is approved by our beta testers we will release it in 2 to 3 days.
-
Is possible, somewhere, read reported bugs ? Unfortunately I today see, that alerts don't work and this discuss is so long too check, if somebody report this problem. In v2 with some definition of alerts absolutely no problem ... :-(
Pavel
-
Hi PJP and welcome - alerts are being fixed.
Rod
-
Hi
I have just down loaded the latest version. Got this message.
This application failed to start because rb.dll was not found. Re-install the application may fix this problem
Dudley
-
Dudley is it the beta version you have downloaded?
If so check it has not installed itself as a seperate folder within your anrb folder, if so just copy the files into the origional folder overwriting the v2.1
-
Hi
I have just down loaded the latest version. Got this message.
This application failed to start because rb.dll was not found. Re-install the application may fix this problem
Dudley
I have just tried to download the patch and have got exactly the same message and as far as I can see anrb.exe has not been added to any other folder. AirNav Systems, help is required.
MTIA
Nigel
-
Nigel
Glad I am not the only one.
-
I assume you are talking about the patch version that development is talking about if so please use the closed beta testing forum.
Otherwise ensure you have downloaded the exe file to RB folder.
-
This is a well know V3.0 Beta problem. Wait a few more days to get the corrected version.
-
Airnav
How do you get access to the closed beta test forum.
Dudley
-
Hi
I have just down loaded the latest version. Got this message.
This application failed to start because rb.dll was not found. Re-install the application may fix this problem
Dudley
I have just tried to download the patch and have got exactly the same message and as far as I can see anrb.exe has not been added to any other folder. AirNav Systems, help is required.
MTIA
Nigel
Hello Jollygreen/Dudbaker
Does the patch show as ANRB.EX_
If it does you have to delete the underscore at the end and replace it with an E
so it looks like ANRB.EXE then it will work:-)
Copy your old ANRB.exe to a safe file first then cut and paste the new one in
HTH John
-
Something to look forward to - better satelite image downloads:
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3607/3705049074_4333120772_o.gif)
-
I have already downloaded the original 3.0 Beta version. I got an E:mail re the patch and that is what I cannot get to work. So do I have to wait a few days for this to be corrected before the patch works and I can check if the points I raised have been corrected?
Regards
Nigel
-
Jollygreen, when you downloaded the anrb.exe, what did you do with it? You have to move it into the Radarbox 2009 folder and replace the one that's already there.
This discussion really should be on the closed beta forum.
-
Hi
At the risk of being told off for being in the wrong forum, I now have it working. I moved the patch from Downloads to Airnav. I now feel as if I am in the same club as everyone else.
Dudley
-
Tarbat
How do you get access to the closed beta forum. It is no good telling us we should be their without telling us how to get their.
Dudley
-
Well done Dudley :-)
This beta software testing is fun!
-
Dudley, I guess you need to ask Airnav that.
I'd assumed that everyone Airnav emailed about the patch 1 closed beta testing was on the beta forum.
-
Tarbat
You will see in reply 143 I did ask airnav after they reprimanded me. I am doing my best.
Dudley
-
Something to look forward to - better satelite image downloads:
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3607/3705049074_4333120772_o.gif)
tarbat
very niece.
from pat
-
Tarbat
Was there a specific Beta forum, as if there was I am not on it as far as I know. I just raised a question about duplicates in MyLog and flights disappearings from the 'radar' screen.
All I am trying to do is get the patch and it is not working for me as I cannot see where the new download has gone.
If I have to wait a few days for it to be released to non Beta testers, as I am away from tomorrow as a show in Somerset,so be it.
Question is then, if I was not a Beta tester in the first place, why did I get the E:mail re the patch.
All said, where I live AirNav has made a great difference to my spotting as I now have managed to add close to 1800 frames due to living under several major flight paths out of Europe to Southern Europe, USA & Canada. Excellant piece of kit and AirNav, keep up the good work!!
Nigel
-
@Jollygreen I guess there are members here in a closed beta group that were invited to the group. I'm sure there will be a patch or something soon for us plebs :)
Another
Nigel
-
If you got the email Jollygreen you must be signed up to the beta test prog! I guess you are missing the closed beta test login details.
-
@Jollygreen I guess there are members here in a closed beta group that were invited to the group. I'm sure there will be a patch or something soon for us plebs :)
Another
Nigel
Airnav can't win here, they were criticised for not having a closed beta thread, they put that right but now they seem to have offended some members in the process.
For those not involved it will be worth the wait, they have been listening and there are some excellent additions.
-
Nigel
I am using Google Chrome. When I downloaded Patch 1 a box appeared in the bottom left. There was a small arrow on that which I selected and it took me to where the download was.
Dudley
-
Does anyone know if V3 Beta has a problem downloading aircraft pictures, or is there an issue with the servers obtaining them from GAS / airliners.net
-
Photo download appears to be broken at the moment - probably, in all versions.
-
Thanks for that Tarbat
-
Dudley? What are you saying? Using Chrome you get a link to the closed beta program!
-
Hi all,
Someone asked for the history to appear in myflights but I can't seem to find the post that refers to it. Below is a screenshot from the beta patch I'm running, I thought it my invoke some feedback. Its a nice feature but my preferance would be to have it selectable on/off, which at the moment it isn't. It shows the history of the flight selected.
What do you think?
Cheers John
-
John - Tools...Show Flight History.
BTW - it's going to be below the photo panel.
Rod
-
John - Tools...Show Flight History.
BTW - it's going to be below the photo panel.
Rod
Ohhh yes so it is. Thanks Rod I missed that one.
Cheers John
-
Hi all,
Someone asked for the history to appear in myflights but I can't seem to find the post that refers to it. Below is a screenshot from the beta patch I'm running, I thought it my invoke some feedback. Its a nice feature but my preferance would be to have it selectable on/off, which at the moment it isn't. It shows the history of the flight selected.
What do you think?
Cheers John
What do I think?
I don't have enough screen real estate to show aircraft in MyFlights as it stands - shame really as I have 2 x 19" Eizo TFT monitors running 1280 x 1024 - that's an awful lot of wasted screen space that I can't use with the app in its current configuration...:-(
This information is shown in MyLog anyway - is it really needed here also?
Please tell me Rod is correct and it can at least be turned off?
Something I suggested many months ago (and today also:-) would be a function to right-click on an aircraft either on the radar screen or in the list to have a pop-up menu appear (much like the standard Windows feature) where a selection of options would appear including one called 'History' that would open up to show the flight history.
See here; http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2885.msg28252#msg28252
Regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
Please tell me Rod is correct and it can at least be turned off?
As Rod says, it can be turned off, so it's not a problem.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2662/3711577609_92589a4c59_t.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/3711577609/sizes/o/)
I have it turned ON, its a very useful way of seeing the last three routes that an aircraft has recently been flying.
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3421/3706439011_e2c7836486_t.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/3706439011/sizes/o/)
Something I suggested many months ago (and today also:-) would be a function to right-click on an aircraft either on the radar screen or in the list to have a pop-up menu appear (much like the standard Windows feature) where a selection of options would appear including one called 'History' that would open up to show the flight history.
There are more right-click options in the latest beta:
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3188/3711636503_0bc52fe876_t.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/3711636503/sizes/o/)
-
I like it!!!
-
Hi, i used the upgrade from v2 to 3 and get this windows message.
"ANRB.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience."
So i tried the full install and its exactly the same, the second you double click the exe it comes up with this message.
Tried re-booting but still the same.
I'm running xp
Gonna put v2 back, hope that will work again
-
Right click on the icon and choose the compability mode to run as windows 98/Me. That will make it work.
-
Please tell me Rod is correct and it can at least be turned off?
As Rod says, it can be turned off, so it's not a problem.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2662/3711577609_92589a4c59_t.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/3711577609/sizes/o/)
I have it turned ON, its a very useful way of seeing the last three routes that an aircraft has recently been flying.
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3421/3706439011_e2c7836486_t.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/3706439011/sizes/o/)
Something I suggested many months ago (and today also:-) would be a function to right-click on an aircraft either on the radar screen or in the list to have a pop-up menu appear (much like the standard Windows feature) where a selection of options would appear including one called 'History' that would open up to show the flight history.
There are more right-click options in the latest beta:
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3188/3711636503_0bc52fe876_t.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarbat/3711636503/sizes/o/)
Tarbat,
Having looked at your screen above re turning off and on the 'show flight history', I don't seem to have that feature. When I go into the Tools menu from the Map screen it shows all the same subjects as yours including 'show photo details' but nothing to do with 'show flight history' which is the subject directly below 'show flight details' on your screen or am I using the wrong Tools menu.
Ian
-
Airnav please give us an update on the progress of patch1
Thanks MARC
-
Ian - this option is only available on the very latest Beta version, available only to the closed group of testers.
Unless you are in that group, I'm afraid you'll have to wait until it's released. We're still fighting the last remaining gremlins!
Marc - that sort of answers your question too - some of these gremlins are dogged little things.
Rod
-
AirNav Support,
Yes it worked as you suggested "compability mode to run as windows 98/Me"
Seems strange to have to do that tho.
Cheers
-
Thanks we all looking forward !
-
Slipdog
This is a short term solution. A permanet fix is imminent.
Dudley
-
Ian - this option is only available on the very latest Beta version, available only to the closed group of testers.
Unless you are in that group, I'm afraid you'll have to wait until it's released. We're still fighting the last remaining gremlins!
Marc - that sort of answers your question too - some of these gremlins are dogged little things.
Rod
Thanks for that Rod. I thought maybe I had missed something. I will remain waiting with anticipation.
Ian
-
Hi. Airnav. When can we expect drivers for VISTA 64 bit? It's really a shame I still can't use radarbox! It's been long! Please let me know. Thanks!
-
I have V3 Beta patch 1 I'm not in the closed beta test. I can say that things are improving!
-
Things may have moved beyond patch 1 I'm guessing :)
-
We are trying to get the drivers for Vista64bit but tying to navigate round the various different paths that Microsoft has to get it ready. It will get there eventually.
-
Question/Issue on Altitude - something seen on V2 and V3 Beta.
Why do some get logged in MyLog with leading zeros, and some that don't
Example, I have Start Altitude of 00095 on 19/06/09 for D-ABIM then 20 on 19/6/09, and then on 14/7/09 I have this as 01100.
Then in MyFlights, if I filter on Altitude < 5000, I get everthing, and just worked out that that needs to be < 05000, but in the Altitude field in MyFlights they don't have a leading zero.
I would assume Altitude is logged in the database as a numeric field, so should be fairly straight forward to program this, and any Altitude to have 'ToNum' applied to it, regardless of what comes from the ADSB info.
Rick
-
I would assume Altitude is logged in the database as a numeric field
Start and End Altitudes are stored as varchar(6).
-
Thanks Tarbat
Any reason why this is the case?
Rick
-
Any reason why this is the case?
It was a compromise when the database was first designed. All fields were originally defined as TEXT, which was less than ideal. I recommended that fields were re-defined to something more suitable, but by then most of the programming had already been done based on TEXT fields. So VARCHAR was the best compromise which I implemented on behalf of Airnav.
-
When is part 3 patch released?
-
We will release Patch 2 in 2 to 5 days. We are just awaiting for the answer of 2 beta testers on some pending items.
-
We will release Patch 2 in 2 to 5 days. We are just awaiting for the answer of 2 beta testers on some pending items.
Have I missed patch 1?
-
Hi,
Without sounding too stupid!
Are the patches just for the beta testers? (i cant seem to find them anywhere)
Also i've been running v3 beta but i'm struggling to find any differences between v2 and v3
Cheers
Rich
-
The patches are part of the closed beta testing. These versions of the software are experimental and are aimed at solving particular issues and are therefore not suitable for general release.
All beta software is test software, but the patches are experimental software.
-
Found a bit of a bug tho but i dont know if it was in v2 also.
When selecting to filter for my local airport EGNX at top of screen (to just view flights to and from EGNX)
When de-selecting for a minute i noticed a flight from KSDF via KPHL to EGNX but it wont show when the airport filter is on.
So i think a bit of code needs tweeking to check for the filter airport if there is an airport via in the flight details too.
Hope you get what i mean.
Not sure if its been mentioned before.
Rich.
-
As Allocator says, the Patch versions are just being tested by the closed group of Beta testers at the moment - most gremlins have beed wrestled to the ground now - just a couple of stubborn ones are still standing!
See the first post in this thread for differences between versions 2 and 3.
Rod
-
Rich,
Page 1 of this thread might help to answer your second question: http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2958.0 (http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2958.0)
-
ok cheers guys, i'll have a look
-
The list looks very promising.
@Terre
I couldn't see anything on that page regarding airport filtering problems
-
Hi. I read before that, if using vista 64bit, i can use EASYBCD to allow unsigned driver to work and so i did and while installing driver, it just says it found the driver but encountered problem installing it (code 39).
Can someone help me please or point me in the right direction?
Thanks so much.
Swadeep
-
We are getting very close to a long way of certificating our driver with Microsoft. We hope to have all this ready in 2 weeks.
-
@ Rich (Slipdog)
It's the second post of AirNav that contains the list of all Improvements/Suggestions. Use this link: http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2958.msg26977#msg26977 (http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2958.msg26977#msg26977)
regards, Terre
-
We are getting very close to a long way of certificating our driver with Microsoft. We hope to have all this ready in 2 weeks.
Two weeks!!! That's so long and far away. Every min that is passing by I am losing out on the free 1 Year network subscription. Oh well. Thanks for you answer airnav. Will wait longer. Please make it happen soon :) Thanks
-
You can start Vista 64bit without requiring signed drivers by:
Restart your machine. Press F8 when windows begins to load and choose the Windows Vista—“Disable Driver Signature Enforcement”
Option, then install the drivers and it should work fine.
-
What about an enhancement to SmartView to allow inputting of Mode-S details along with Callsigns?
I have copied & pasted all of the Registrations I have in Alerts into SmartView and it is very handy to hear an Alert and quickly glance at the SmartView tab to see if it is being picked up as was the case with G-VLCN - this afternoon.
In Alerts I also use wildcarded 43C* and AE* / AD* to alert me to RAF & USAF aircraft and it would be good to see them listed in SmartView because most of them don't appear on the map due to no ADS-B positioning information so the ability to quickly view any pertinent information on the target would be a good thing.
Would anybody else find this a handy feature to have?
Hopefully one for the list Terre!
Thanks & regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
Looks as if I'll have to update and expand the list and the poll soon...
-
ant news on complete version 3.1 yet ???
-
There is no full version yet. We will be releasing patch 1 of the beta soon to the public.
Depending on its sucess we will release the full version.
-
Anyone else experiencing the map not loading on startup?. Ive had to go back to version 2 as the map will not load after 2 startups.?
Ch33sey
-
A very small change that I would like to see around the emailing of Logs...
When the email arrives it is from the Users Name.
However when I receive an email from the Alert feature it is from RadarBox 2009 whatever-version-you-are-running
For me anyway I would like to standardise the sending email address to be constant and be listed as the program name instead of the user name.
When I look for emails from RB it does not register that I should also be looking for emails from myself!
Maybe change this to show the same sending email address as Alerts or make it configurable?
The reason I ask is because I have various automated tasks running here and on remote sites from which I receive updates/warnings/status emails etc. and without exception I am able to configure the sending address to make it easy to determine at a glance where the email is from and simplify setting up Rules to deal with them.
A minor change I know but it would work well for me - anyone?
Thanks & regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
ch33e
I have had problems with the map since v2.
I usually find if I select another map and then select back to home it works.
I thought origionally it was my video card on my laptop, but seems not?
-
We will release Patch 2 in 2 to 5 days. We are just awaiting for the answer of 2 beta testers on some pending items.
Any update on this folks? It's past the end of that window and it's gone a bit quiet again....
-
When it goes quiet that is usually a good sign...just around the corner! ;^)
Kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
Is this a tumbleweed moment? ;-)
-
@ Glyn
Yes, i'm with you on the email reports, the sender says me.
Cheers
Rich.
-
@ Glyn
Yes, i'm with you on the email reports, the sender says me.
Cheers
Rich.
Hi Rich,
Well that's a 100% increase in the number of users who would find this useful :-)
I suspect that RB is using the User Name set in Preferences/Home Station Data for the senders name but as I said earlier the email Log function doesn't so it also seems a bit odd that there is not continuity across the email functions within the app?
Here's hoping...
Thanks & kind regards,
-=Glyn=-
-
V3.01 Beta Released so this thread is now locked.
Follow all the discussion at:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=3141.new#new